Turkey, Istanbul Anarchy Initiative: "On April 24, 1915 that" what comes to mind when you think (tr)

Turkey, Istanbul Anarchy Initiative: "On April 24, 1915
that" what comes to mind when you think (tr) [machine
translation] 

Figures, "Is there a document?" S official history or ideology "supposedly" like? It seems 
that the more intense because of the 100th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide in the 
diagram on the agenda, not the kind that snap easily scratched. Starting with 1896, 1909 
Cilicia has reached its peak with the ongoing process of Armenian genocide 24 April 1915 
and the impact of today still retains able to tell. As long as the corresponding date in 
1915 the creation of the Turkish nation-state identity, is roughly the biggest disaster 
for the Armenians, to tell you the name.So you need to how to interpret this catastrophe? 
We will not turn our direction to pinpoint the value of citizenship-nation relationship as 
the pain caused by the next disaster? Or all disaster figures, we will reduce the 
statistical debate did not come to end? Basic problems standing in front of us I think, 
society is still ongoing contribution of this disaster and the state ideology adhering to 
social psychology.

The back of our era before everything is consistent with each other and have been written 
by Armenian memories, daily, we need to dayama the novel documents and testimony. Empire 
Armenians produces a significant part of the basic cultural work in the region offers a 
rich document pool. If we feel the need to constantly document, do not have no fear; many 
Armenian writers have had to put pen these massacres. Collects the testimony of the second 
degree of the Armenian massacres in Cilicia in 1909, Zabel Yesayan this testimony by 
bringing together "Among the Ruins" was released a witness named instance. Yesayan what I 
was saying in this book? Armenians as citizens who were victims of the death of one of 
their defining "meaning" and giving. However, along with these thoughts would 1915'l 
completely changed.

Enumerating the weakness in the disaster Yesayan literature tries to break a little, 
trying to work up to the end of what we call the witness. Yervant Odyan years of the 
Damned, Hagop Oshagan the Artakalanlar of Gurgen Mahari's Burning Bindings are referring 
to different aspects of the disaster, the different instances of witness "to our liking," 
he offers. However, "the real disaster is the death of a witness" he told Marc Nichanian.

The above-mentioned before and after the April 24, 1915 will no doubt allow us to read 
texts. But just enough to explain the readings disaster? Probably something related to the 
Armenian Genocide in this country everyone has heard something about the Armenian genocide 
of around carefully before reading. Even if hearing "Armenian" was heard swearing word 
means. What if the gain citizenship on behalf of the Armenian identity in a society that 
chooses the path of the victims were children.

Nesim Ovadya İzrail April 24, published in 2014, 1915: Istanbul, Çankırı, Ayas, Ankara 
book is perhaps the compact one of the public in a way the finest research offers the 
reader until you reach the source of all these processes. One of the most striking point 
of the text of the political-apolitical book without even the deportation of the Armenians 
and then exposing the massacre. Relocation of the state's more, some of the gang massacre 
released from prison while more police / soldiers and has become the task of certain 
sectors of society. So we see today is what does this mean? Surely there was a systematic 
state apparatus and the international community's response on behalf of the Armenians had 
more pull to be prey to organized civil force. This form is also common that the 
perpetrators of the massacre would become ideal citizens. What was the nationality? Some 
nationalist and racist state was ostentatious ornament of some applications, perhaps it 
was legitimizing.

Benjamin said, I think you need to leave. Theses on the Concept of History, Benjamin takes 
the concept of historical materialism aside, he describes it as the dominant conception of 
history. Then what was he doing? Bottom operating concept with a date against the concept 
of historical materialism was putting historicism. Thus, it is possible to hear the sound 
of the voice was heard. It is precisely here comes the issue of witness circuits. April 
24, 1915 because of what it means mainly stored in these words, though. However, as 
mentioned Nişanyan "The Republic of Turkey is a country where the prohibition of 
mourning." Admittedly Turkified Armenian masses were forcibly converted to Islam or face a 
major disaster at least as much as the victim of the massacre. To suppress the Armenian 
identity, being not survive the catastrophe hysteria, but also contradictory to the 
principles of social memory as two processes feed each other trauma to the Armenians, had 
to rest. They have become scattered pomegranate seeds around. This pomegranate seeds 
brought permanent wherever they touch different shades of red.

Do not forget: "On April 24, 1915 that" a multi-layered process.

Dissolution of the empire, dissolved empire 'save' behalf afraid of committing any crimes 
against the people of Union and Progress mentality, bitter illusion of this mentality, a 
certain period of flirting with Armenian nationalists, this mentality took over the TC 
founder staff in order to create a unitary state, employment holocaust TC state structure 
in and rewarded persuasion, murder common with / be the other Anatolian masses, documents, 
figures, history can be made / political discussion are the main line.

Yet after all these discussions; national identity, unitary state, and how is the proof 
that can cause great slaughter and suffering of the Armenian genocide desire uniform 
citizenship.

And is the symbol of unending desire to face the truth and at the same time.

Istanbul Anarchy Initiative

http://sosyalsavas.org/2015/04/24-nisan-1915-dendiginde-ne-gelir-akla-istanbul-anarsi-inisiyatifi/#more-26453