Two wars ---- Firstly, it is already obvious that the number of militaryconflicts in the world is increasing. In general, this is a very badtrend, which may signal the approaching next world war, but more on thatanother time. ---- Our attention, for obvious reasons, is mainly focusedon two of these conflicts: Israel's war against Hamas and Russia's waragainst Ukraine. It is interesting to reflect on the anarchist attitudetowards both. Of course, a lot has already been said about this, butstill. ---- Is there a difference between these wars? In both cases,states fight among themselves (Hamas is, of course, a quasi-state, butall the main signs are still there). Traditionally, anarchists in suchcases have taken the position of "both are worse" and "a plague on bothyour houses." That is, there is no need to support either side, becausetheir interests do not correlate at all with the interests of themajority of people. It seems to me that if you look at these two wars,then this position is applicable to one of them, but not to the other.In the confrontation between Israel and Hamas, "both are worse." On theone hand, there is an archaic organization of religious fanatics whofiercely hate everything that goes beyond the framework of traditionalIslam. On the other hand, the far-right government of a virtuallymono-ethnic state - a government that began to suppress any freedomseven before the start of the war, and only after the Hamas attack turnedaround with all its might. For example, in Israel it is already possibleto receive criminal prosecution for the so-called "consumption ofterrorist publications" on the Internet. Note, not likes or reposts,but just reading. It's difficult to keep track of repressive laws inRussia, but it seems that even there they still don't jail you forsimply subscribing to an "extremist" channel. So it's a stretch to callIsrael a "democratic country."Neither Hamas nor Israel are shy about bombing peaceful cities. Neitherthe victory of Hamas nor the victory of Israel (no matter how this"victory" is understood) will lead to a resolution of the decades-longconflict, but will only aggravate it. Therefore, I don't want to wishvictory to either one or the other.This conflict will only be resolved when Jews and Arabs stop proceedingfrom the neoliberal concept of "my freedom is limited by the freedom ofothers" and accept the libertarian concept that "my freedom is expandedby the freedom of other people." You can either shoot each other, orlearn to co-exist and see new opportunities and new value in this. It'slike the "snails" of the Mexican Zapatistas: it is important to heareach other, without this there will be no self-government.By the way, just in case, we remind you that the Zapatistas are not onlydelicious coffee, but also interesting anti-authoritarian politicalideas; Read on our website the latest news from the Zapatistas aspresented by the Molotov cooperative.On the other hand, there are significant differences in theRussian-Ukrainian war. Yes, two states are also at war (more precisely,one state against an entire coalition of other states that supportUkraine). But Russia is a state whose political regime has been openlyfascist for several years now. There is conservative ideology, harshauthoritarianism, political repression, aggressive wars, attempts atexpansionist foreign policy, and much more. Plus there are nuclearweapons, which dramatically raises the stakes.As for Ukraine, this is, of course, to put it mildly, not an anarchistideal. This is a bourgeois-oligarchic political regime with all its, soto speak, charms, plus it is also mired in corruption. Lately, therehave been certain signs of his slipping towards authoritarianism (theclearly looming cancellation of the presidential elections, and that'sall). But still, Ukraine is still very, very far from Russian fascism -including in terms of the level of internal political repression. TheUkrainian political regime has not pursued and does not intend to pursuean expansionist foreign policy, does not promote conservative discourse,and is much more dependent on the will of the people.It is clear that Ukraine is supported by NATO, which includes manycountries with very unsympathetic political regimes. They have their owninterests: the United States, for example, is strongly interested intaking over the world gas market and pushing Russia into the background(in principle, so far everything is going that way). But, speakingpragmatically, the prospect of expansion of the so-called "Russianworld," in my opinion, is much worse than the prospect of billions ofgas flowing from the pockets of the Russian bourgeoisie to the pocketsof the American bourgeoisie. The seizure of Ukraine by Russia would leadto a sharp fascistization of a vast territory. As an anarchist, Idefinitely don't want this. Therefore, it seems to me that the logic"both are worse" is not applicable to the Ukrainian war, and I certainlydo not wish Russia a victory, but I rather rejoice at the successes ofthe Ukrainian troops, although in the current positional war thesesuccesses are very limited.And it is not at all surprising that openly anti-authoritarianself-organized groups of anarchists are fighting on the side of Ukraine, but we do not see anything like that in the Russian army. We havealready written several times about our comrade from Moscow DmitryPetrov ("Ecologist"), who died in the battles near Bakhmut on the sideof Ukraine. These people are anarchists and do not support any states,but they think practically, and they follow the most realistic path ofresistance to the most important enemy of today. I think this is theright choice.The struggle in emigration: hopeless or not?Another important topic that makes sense to think about is politicalemigration.On November 11, an anti-fascist action "For our and your freedom" tookplace in Warsaw . Actions of solidarity with Russian anarchist politicalprisoners are regularly held in Tbilisi and other cities in thepost-Soviet space. Naturally, many emigrants from the Russian Federationtake part in them - anarchists and anti-fascists who fled fromrepression or from mobilization, or simply from the oppressiveatmosphere of authoritarianism.That is, in the so-called "abroad" there are now almost moreRussian-speaking anarchists than in Russia itself. Most of them continuepolitical activism aimed at the Russian Federation, and, of course,count on a more or less immediate crisis of the Putin political regimeand a return to their homeland.But an inconvenient question arises: why is this so similar to the waveof emigration from the USSR in the early 1920s? After all, then, too,organizations were created, magazines were published, people publishedentire political programs like "what will we do when the Lenin-Stalinregime collapses" and so on. Nestor Makhno himself, as you know, livedin exile in Paris and, together with Pyotr Arshinov, formulated theso-called "Organizational Platform of the General Union of Anarchists."But, as we now know, the hopes of this wave of emigration were notjustified. Despite all their efforts, the Bolshevik regime, with minortransformations, lasted for another 70 years, and its fall was seen onlyby the children or grandchildren of the then activists. Will this happennow? Isn't all this activity from outside Russia useless?It seems to me that no, it is not useless - and for a very simplereason. The emigrants of a century ago opposed a regime that: 1) ... was headed by very talented politicians, organizers,military leaders, and so on. We are not close to the values and ultimategoals of the Bolsheviks, but the organizational abilities of their firstgeneration are impressive. That is, Lenin, Trotsky and even to someextent Stalin are really strong and smart enemies. 2) ... was based on an ideology aimed at the future . Despite allthe deceit and falsehood of Soviet state capitalism, it still formallypromoted progressive ideas about the liberation of mankind, freedom,equality and brotherhood, and global communism. This attractedsupporters from all over the world to the Bolshevik camp, who proceededfrom the logic "well, this seems to be a progressive political force,and the main thing is that they already have successes, a whole hugecountry at their disposal." The USSR was very successful in gaining allies.For these reasons, the struggle of political emigrants at the beginningof the 20th century was not exactly doomed, but had extremely littlechance of success. At the same time, the modern Russian Federation isunlike the USSR a century ago. It is run not by talented intellectualswho are passionate about progressive ideas, but (for the most part) bythieving bourgeoisie or lazy KGB bureaucrats (who, however, are also notaverse to stealing a couple of billions on occasion). Theirorganizational abilities are at an extremely low level, and the entiresystem as a whole is too heavily tied to loot and its distributionbetween semi-criminal clans.This code either has no ideological basis at all, or it is some kind ofwild mix of Domostroy, fascism, conspiracy theories and Ayn Rand. Youcan't find many strong and smart allies with such an ideology in thecurrent world: you just have to be content with North Korea and Iran.And it's difficult to mobilize your own population for any large-scaleprojects without an inspiring progressive goal. Even the war is quietlysabotaged by this same population; there is no flow of volunteers. It isdifficult to imagine that such a condition can last long.Therefore, the fall or serious transformation of the Putin politicalregime in the coming years is not inevitable, but extremely probable.And in these conditions, maintaining active anti-authoritarian politicalstructures, whether abroad or within Russia, is very important. Ouractions determine which direction those people who are now subjects ofthe so-called "Russian Federation" will move. We will see and do allthis, not our children or grandchildren.So no need to despair. We need to act. On the cover of this episode ofTrends is a drawing of a black cat made by the Belarusian anarchistSergei Romanov, who is now serving a cannibalistic sentence for directaction against the Lukashenko regime. As Sergei said in his last word ,"all the cogs and gears of the repressive machine, together with theircriminal leadership, will be held accountable to the people for all thegrief caused, for the blood shed, for the tears of loved ones andrelatives."Let's together become a black cat that will cross the path of theauthoritarian repressive regimes that grew up on the ruins of the Sovietempire.RepressionWe have already mentioned repressions in Russia today. Naturally, theydo not stop, just as international solidarity does not stop. Right nowthere is an international collection to pay for lawyers foranti-fascists and anarchists accused in the "Tyumen case". Help NikitaOleynik, Roman Paklin, Danila Chertykov, Yuri Neznamov and Deniz Aidyn!The main hearings in the case will begin soon. Yes, lawyers in theRussian law enforcement system can do little in political cases, andsometimes the cops openly threaten them . But lawyers still remain oneof the few tools for connecting a political prisoner with the outsideworld and something that a political prisoner can rely on.In addition, a Ukrainian anti-fascist and anti-authoritarian activist,our long-time comrade Maxim Butkevich, is now in Russian captivity. Hewas captured while fighting in the ranks of the Ukrainian Armed Forces,and in the spring of 2023, a Russian court in Lugansk sentenced him to13 years in prison on false charges of "killing civilians." It's beenalmost three months since he disappeared from the pre-trial detentioncenter, and his relatives and even his lawyer cannot find him .Naturally, Russian propaganda calls the staunch anti-fascist Butkevich a"Nazi."Finally, the details of how the FSB took the anarchist Lev Skoryakin outof Kyrgyzstan became known . A criminal case has been brought againsthim in Russia simply because in 2021 he and a friend unfurled a bannerwith the inscription "Happy ChKist Day" near the FSB office in Moscowand lit a fire.Lev tried to move to a safe country through Kyrgyzstan and even managedto obtain all the necessary documents for emigration to Germany. Butimmediately after this, on October 17, he was detained first by Kyrgyzcops, and then they handed Lev over to the Russian FSB. They forced himonto a plane from Bishkek to Moscow. After the FSB arrived, apparently,they immediately felt more confident, beat Lev right in Domodedovo andsent him to the Butyrka pre-trial detention center.There are two takeaways from this story. First, write letters to Leo andsend parcels . He needs support now more than ever. Secondly, we repeatonce again that Kyrgyzstan is an unsafe country for political refugeesfrom Russia. Putin has too much influence on the Kyrgyz authorities, socooperation between the secret police of both countries is very close.Choose your travel routes carefully, do not forget about safety!Remember that all states are concentration camps, but the conditions inthese concentration camps are different, and many of them are at enmitywith each other. Take advantage of this and find manholes, holes andsecret hiding places in the reinforced concrete walls of the System."Temporary autonomous zones", as Hakim Bey would say . And if we canbuild a dynamic, anti-authoritarian and free network of autonomousmovements, then the System will inevitably collapse.Well that's all for today! We remind you that in Trends in Order andChaos, members of Autonomous Action and other authors give anarchistassessments of current events. Listen to us on YouTube , SoundCloudand other platforms, visit our website avtonom.org , subscribe to ourweekly e-mail newsletter!Issue prepared by ManiHelp our work by taking part in crowdfunding! We will give those whosupport us a nice bonus - a telegram sticker based on the drawings ofthe Khabarovsk anarchist artist Maxim "Hadad" Smolnikov. To receive asticker, make a donation and write about it in the feedback bot of ourTelegram channel .https://avtonom.org/news/chyornaya-koshka-svobody-trendy-poryadka-i-haosa-epizod-131_________________________________________A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C EBy, For, and About AnarchistsSend news reports to A-infos-en mailing listA-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten