It has been four months now since the women and men of Iran have engaged in the
final battle with the country's Islamic government . The intensity of thestruggle shows no sign of abating, despite the deaths at the hands of the police,of women and men, the hangings, the thousands of injured, women raped, tortured,arrests and administrative repression of demonstrators. ---- The mobilizationsand street demonstrations, the acts of civil disobedience, instead of decreasingdue to the effects of an increasingly brutal and murderous repression,intensified and became generalized throughout the territory. Not only that, butindignation prevails over the fear of repression every time the forty days ofmourning for a death recall the violence suffered, triggering the escalation ofrepression in the face of popular demonstrations.What is at stake is civil freedom for the country which at the same time has toface a very heavy economic crisis, a substantial deterioration in the standard ofliving of its population, the growth of ethnic discrimination among itspopulation and also that of the various religious components of the country,governed by the most fundamentalist and radical wing of the Shiite clergy.After forty years of regime the measure seems full.Western states and societies blather about support and support for the people'smovement, but in fact they do nothing but support the movement with some sporadicdemonstrations by civil society and denounce the repression.Iranian political emigration is left alone to be indignant, powerless.The reasons for the lack of supportThe reasons for the lack of support are complex and reside above all in therefusal to tackle the problem of the relationship with the Islamic world in acritical and organic way and therefore the Palestinian problem, the collateralproblem of the Kurdish people, the problems of political management of the Sunnicountries, also in relation to their relationship with those with a Shiite majority.Posing the Palestinian people's problem of having its own land and a state entitythat represents it means clashing with Israel and US interests in the Middle Eastand this, for internal US political reasons, is very difficult, also due to theeconomic implications and the geostrategic consequences. The recent Israelicrackdown on Palestine is proof of this all the more in light of Israel's attemptto use every international crisis, in this case the war in Ukraine, to widen theexpropriation of land and the expulsion of Palestinians.The impossibility even of tackling the Palestinian question is accompanied andcomplicated by the insensitivity towards the Kurdish people, used withoutrestraint in the fight against Isis and then abandoned to the massacre by theTurks, again for geostrategic reasons. but mostly political. And this is becausethe creation of a political entity that includes all of Kurdistan would create awedge in the Islamic world, both on a territorial level, subtracting territoryand resources from Turkey, Iran and Iraq, from Syria, as well as imposing theredefinition of territorial borders as well as military balances in the strategicMiddle Eastern area, would shake the balance of forces between Sunni and Shiitestates to its very foundations.What would be shocked would be both the role and the autocratic management of theSunni Islamic countries, of their tribal autocracies, which live in alliance withthe clergy, strong in oil revenues and gas extraction, which have become evenmore strategic in the context of international alignments after the Ukrainian war, organic allies of the United States,destabilizing the entire Middle East area, especially since the Kurds are thebearers of a civil society project which has demonstrated its ability toeffectively combat clericalism, its ability to promote women's emancipation andsocial rights, knowing how to free those populations from religious-basedconflicts thanks to the construction of a new society based on secularism, genderequality, self-management.Furthermore, what would happen in the Sunni world would certainly force even thecountries with a Shiite majority to look at their own political and powerstructures, at the role of the clergy, at that of the confessional socialstructures which have a strategic function on the economy of those countries. Areview of these ratios and balances would involvetoo many interests, which results in support for the current regime and hinderschange. Only the duration of the mobilization can help the success of thestruggle movement.The editorial staffhttp://www.ucadi.org/2023/02/01/la-lotta-di-lunga-durata-degli-iraniani/_________________________________________A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C EBy, For, and About AnarchistsSend news reports to A-infos-en mailing listA-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten