If fighting against gender-based and sexual violence (SGBV) within our
organizations appears to be a necessity, doing so within an
inter-organizational framework at the national level allows for even
greater policy development, feedback, but also new means deployed. Focus
on a unitary work which opens up numerous perspectives. ---- In 2021,
the confederal leadership of the CGT mandates the monitoring unit
against sexist and sexual violence (CVSS) to establish a link with
existing counterpart units in left-wing parties and unions. A unitary
inter-organizational framework was then created to fight against sexist
and sexual violence, bringing together union organizations (CGT,
Solidaires, CFDT, FSU, Student Union, Peasant Confederation),
politicians (LFI, Ensemble!, EELV, NPA) , UCL, PCF, Left Party,
Generations, the Ecosocialist Left) and associations (Attac, Amnesty
International).
Despite their anti-patriarchal commitments, our organizations are far
from being spared from violence against women and gender minorities. The
inter-orga aims to improve or create our reporting procedures and VSS
management cells. Our objective is to encourage the freedom of victims
to speak and to welcome them as best as possible through solid and
respectful procedures. Promoting feminist training and the prevention of
SGBV internally is essential for any organization with emancipatory
social ambitions. The inter-orga also invites external speakers who are
experts on the subject so that the delegates can continue to train and
enrich their thoughts.
Fight against the homelessness of attackers
At the same time, it is a question of identifying, anticipating and
thwarting the strategies of the attackers so that impunity ends.
Currently, the inter-orga is working on the development of a common
reporting protocol to combat the homelessness of attackers, planned for
November 2024. This reflection intends to politically formalize the
intentions expressed in the first forum of the inter-orga. org of
2021[1]. The movement of attackers from one organization to another when
they undergo exclusion or sidelining measures is a known phenomenon. The
protocol plans to pull the rug out from under them. At the same time, it
would make it possible to thwart threats of defamation complaints or
even public insults since we would not have to communicate their
identity in public to inform the participants in the inter-orga.
This framework allows UCL to detail the operation of its exclusion
procedure in the event of sexual assault. It is also about disseminating
its philosophy, namely the importance of the internal feminist balance
of power. We argue that this tool must be the immediate practical
translation of our principles: the self-organization of women,
non-mixing and the fight against relationships of domination. At the
same time, and because our tools always need to be improved, UCL is
enriched by the reflections and practices of feminists from other
organizations.
A feminist class intervention
In the wake of the #MeToo movement, we regularly see testimonies,
columns and appeals signed by public figures emerge. Certain
celebrities, like Adèle Haenel, have become standards of free speech. If
this entirely positive dynamic reveals a real turning point in the place
given to victims' voices in the public space, the inter-orga against VSS
allows intervention on a different model. It reflects the feminist
aspirations of the activist base, without having them embodied by
individuals. It is a promising space for a combative and collective
feminism that strengthens the unity of our class.
We clearly see that the issue of VSS is closely linked to media coverage
when left-wing organizations have to deal with cases of attackers who
are also public figures, in charge of high political or union positions
and benefiting from a privileged social status such as Adrien Quatennens
or Julien Bayou. These cases carry their additional complexity for the
comrades who manage them, with increased pressure to hand the matter
over to institutional justice rather than the organizations taking it
upon themselves. So that aggressors, even powerful ones, never go
unpunished, feminist solidarity is the key.
Billie (UCL Grenoble)
At UCL, a living procedure
Since the creation of UCL, the internal SGBV case management procedure
has aimed to create a feminist balance of power. For this reason, the
words of the victim are not called into question: the role of the
mandated is not to establish the truth of the facts but to collect the
words of the victim[2]and to enable the organization to make a decision
that will ensure its safety and that of all women and gender minorities
in the organization. To date, to facilitate speech, the procedure is
carried out entirely in a single-sex group (of people experiencing
misogyny and transmisogyny). It is implemented when a person alerts the
organization of a case of SGBV. The attacker is then immediately
suspended from the organization. The Federal Secretariat then mandates a
commission to carry out the procedure. These people are responsible,
initially, for making contact with the victim and affirming the support
of the organization in the steps they wish to take. The delegates
collect his testimony.
Secondly, the agents contact the accused person in order to obtain their
version of the facts, and above all to ask them what they have put in
place since they were reported to the organization. These two interviews
allow the delegates to write a report which contains a summary of the
facts, proposals from the delegates on the decision to be taken as well
as a political analysis of the facts when possible. This report is
submitted to a vote by the Federal Coordination[3]so that the entire
organization can make a decision, which can range from temporary
exclusion to permanent exclusion of the accused person.
Since the Angers congress in 2023, cases of VSS in non-heterosexual
settings have been managed by local groups and no longer by the federal
procedure. Indeed, it was built to oppose the fundamental asymmetry of
power between men and women under patriarchy. However, in cases of SGBV
in a non-heterosexual context, this analytical framework is powerless
and the procedure malfunctions. The objective of this decision is to
give the UCL antipatriarchy commission time to equip itself with the
theoretical and practical tools in order to think about the specific
relationships of domination that play out in this type of framework.
To validate
[1]"Inter-orgas Tribune "Together against sexist and sexual violence in
our organizations!"»
[2]"Victim" is not an essentialized position, but the state of a person
at a given moment.
[3]Body which meets every three months, within which the representatives
of each local group discuss a set of texts previously debated locally
and then vote.
https://www.unioncommunistelibertaire.org/?VSS-Le-travail-unitaire-comme-strategie-feministe
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
organizations appears to be a necessity, doing so within an
inter-organizational framework at the national level allows for even
greater policy development, feedback, but also new means deployed. Focus
on a unitary work which opens up numerous perspectives. ---- In 2021,
the confederal leadership of the CGT mandates the monitoring unit
against sexist and sexual violence (CVSS) to establish a link with
existing counterpart units in left-wing parties and unions. A unitary
inter-organizational framework was then created to fight against sexist
and sexual violence, bringing together union organizations (CGT,
Solidaires, CFDT, FSU, Student Union, Peasant Confederation),
politicians (LFI, Ensemble!, EELV, NPA) , UCL, PCF, Left Party,
Generations, the Ecosocialist Left) and associations (Attac, Amnesty
International).
Despite their anti-patriarchal commitments, our organizations are far
from being spared from violence against women and gender minorities. The
inter-orga aims to improve or create our reporting procedures and VSS
management cells. Our objective is to encourage the freedom of victims
to speak and to welcome them as best as possible through solid and
respectful procedures. Promoting feminist training and the prevention of
SGBV internally is essential for any organization with emancipatory
social ambitions. The inter-orga also invites external speakers who are
experts on the subject so that the delegates can continue to train and
enrich their thoughts.
Fight against the homelessness of attackers
At the same time, it is a question of identifying, anticipating and
thwarting the strategies of the attackers so that impunity ends.
Currently, the inter-orga is working on the development of a common
reporting protocol to combat the homelessness of attackers, planned for
November 2024. This reflection intends to politically formalize the
intentions expressed in the first forum of the inter-orga. org of
2021[1]. The movement of attackers from one organization to another when
they undergo exclusion or sidelining measures is a known phenomenon. The
protocol plans to pull the rug out from under them. At the same time, it
would make it possible to thwart threats of defamation complaints or
even public insults since we would not have to communicate their
identity in public to inform the participants in the inter-orga.
This framework allows UCL to detail the operation of its exclusion
procedure in the event of sexual assault. It is also about disseminating
its philosophy, namely the importance of the internal feminist balance
of power. We argue that this tool must be the immediate practical
translation of our principles: the self-organization of women,
non-mixing and the fight against relationships of domination. At the
same time, and because our tools always need to be improved, UCL is
enriched by the reflections and practices of feminists from other
organizations.
A feminist class intervention
In the wake of the #MeToo movement, we regularly see testimonies,
columns and appeals signed by public figures emerge. Certain
celebrities, like Adèle Haenel, have become standards of free speech. If
this entirely positive dynamic reveals a real turning point in the place
given to victims' voices in the public space, the inter-orga against VSS
allows intervention on a different model. It reflects the feminist
aspirations of the activist base, without having them embodied by
individuals. It is a promising space for a combative and collective
feminism that strengthens the unity of our class.
We clearly see that the issue of VSS is closely linked to media coverage
when left-wing organizations have to deal with cases of attackers who
are also public figures, in charge of high political or union positions
and benefiting from a privileged social status such as Adrien Quatennens
or Julien Bayou. These cases carry their additional complexity for the
comrades who manage them, with increased pressure to hand the matter
over to institutional justice rather than the organizations taking it
upon themselves. So that aggressors, even powerful ones, never go
unpunished, feminist solidarity is the key.
Billie (UCL Grenoble)
At UCL, a living procedure
Since the creation of UCL, the internal SGBV case management procedure
has aimed to create a feminist balance of power. For this reason, the
words of the victim are not called into question: the role of the
mandated is not to establish the truth of the facts but to collect the
words of the victim[2]and to enable the organization to make a decision
that will ensure its safety and that of all women and gender minorities
in the organization. To date, to facilitate speech, the procedure is
carried out entirely in a single-sex group (of people experiencing
misogyny and transmisogyny). It is implemented when a person alerts the
organization of a case of SGBV. The attacker is then immediately
suspended from the organization. The Federal Secretariat then mandates a
commission to carry out the procedure. These people are responsible,
initially, for making contact with the victim and affirming the support
of the organization in the steps they wish to take. The delegates
collect his testimony.
Secondly, the agents contact the accused person in order to obtain their
version of the facts, and above all to ask them what they have put in
place since they were reported to the organization. These two interviews
allow the delegates to write a report which contains a summary of the
facts, proposals from the delegates on the decision to be taken as well
as a political analysis of the facts when possible. This report is
submitted to a vote by the Federal Coordination[3]so that the entire
organization can make a decision, which can range from temporary
exclusion to permanent exclusion of the accused person.
Since the Angers congress in 2023, cases of VSS in non-heterosexual
settings have been managed by local groups and no longer by the federal
procedure. Indeed, it was built to oppose the fundamental asymmetry of
power between men and women under patriarchy. However, in cases of SGBV
in a non-heterosexual context, this analytical framework is powerless
and the procedure malfunctions. The objective of this decision is to
give the UCL antipatriarchy commission time to equip itself with the
theoretical and practical tools in order to think about the specific
relationships of domination that play out in this type of framework.
To validate
[1]"Inter-orgas Tribune "Together against sexist and sexual violence in
our organizations!"»
[2]"Victim" is not an essentialized position, but the state of a person
at a given moment.
[3]Body which meets every three months, within which the representatives
of each local group discuss a set of texts previously debated locally
and then vote.
https://www.unioncommunistelibertaire.org/?VSS-Le-travail-unitaire-comme-strategie-feministe
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten