On September 5, 1981, the arrival of a small delegation of Welsh women at the gates of the Royal Air Force (RAF) air base on Greenham Common did not seem destined to rewrite the history of twentieth-century social movements. Yet, what began as a protest march against NATO's decision to deploy nuclear cruise missiles on British soil transformed into a permanent occupation that lasted nineteen years, an experiment in radical communal life, and an unprecedented challenge to the structures of patriarchy and global militarism. Greenham Common was not just a protest, but a laboratory of ecofeminist resistance that demonstrated how the female body, when it reclaims public space and challenges the logic of total destruction, becomes a disruptive political force capable of undermining the very foundations of the militarized state.
The roots of Greenham Common lie in the climate of renewed Cold War tension of the late 1970s. On December 12, 1979, NATO adopted the so-called "Dual-Track Decision," a strategy that called for the modernization of nuclear forces in Europe in response to the deployment of Soviet SS-20 missiles. In Great Britain, the Conservative government led by Margaret Thatcher agreed to host ninety-six Tomahawk cruise missiles at the Greenham Common base in Berkshire. These missiles, owned and controlled exclusively by the United States, posed an existential threat: with no "dual-key" system for launching them, British territory became a prime target without any effective control over its nuclear fate.
The institutional reaction was virtually nonexistent, but dissent began to simmer within civil society. In 1980, four Welsh friends-Ann Pettitt, Karmen Cutler, Lynne Whittemore, and Liney Seward-founded the group "Women for Life on Earth." Their vision was not only pacifist, but deeply rooted in an ethic of responsibility towards future generations. They decided to organize a 120-mile (about 193 km) march, starting from Cardiff City Hall and ending at Greenham Common. The march, attended by about 40 people, mostly women, began on August 27, 1981, from Cardiff City Hall and concluded on September 5, 1981.
Upon their arrival, the delegation delivered an open letter to the base commander. It read: "We have taken this action because we believe that the nuclear arms race constitutes the greatest threat ever faced by the human race and our living planet." When their request for a televised debate with government ministers was contemptuously ignored, thirty-six women chained themselves to the base fence, declaring that they would not leave until the missiles were removed. This was the beginning of the Greenham Common Women's Peace Camp.
Initially, the camp was open to both men and women, but in February 1982, the community made a radical decision: the camp would become an exclusively female space. This choice was not driven by abstract ideological separatism, but by practical needs and political observations on the ground. Activists noted that the male presence tended to polarize relationships with the police, triggering dynamics of physical violence that women preferred to avoid through passive resistance. Furthermore, they realized that, within a mixed movement, women often ended up reproducing domestic or subordinate roles, while in a women-only space, they were forced to manage every aspect of survival, from politics to logistics.
The exclusion of men also served to send a powerful symbolic message: the contrast between the male world of military decisions and the female world of protecting life. This choice transformed Greenham into a magnet for women seeking not only to abolish nuclear weapons, but to overthrow patriarchal systems of oppression. The camp became a refuge for women from the LGBTQIA+ community, offering respite from daily discrimination at a time when lesbian mothers regularly risked losing custody of their children.
To manage an occupation that stretched along the base's 14-kilometer fence, the camp organized itself organically and non-hierarchically. There were no leaders; decisions were made by consensus around campfires. Each main entrance to the base housed a settlement, identified by a rainbow color to contrast with the base's military aesthetic.
The yellow gate was the political heart, serving as a hub for media relations and legal battles; the blue gate was known for its "New Age" atmosphere, music, and the presence of many young women; the green gate, located in the woods, was considered the safest for children and was strictly separatist; the purple gate was characterized by a strong religious and spiritual focus; the turquoise and emerald gates were expansion zones that connected the main settlements along the perimeter.
Daily life was a constant challenge against the elements and repression. Women lived in "benders," hemispherical shelters constructed from woven hazel or willow branches and covered with plastic sheeting. Without running water, electricity, or sanitation, the community relied on radical solidarity. Every day, residents faced forced evictions by "bailiffs" (court officials) who, supported by the police, threw their few belongings into "munchers" (garbage compactors). This precariousness became an integral part of their protest: demonstrating that it was possible to live with almost nothing while resisting the supreme destruction represented by nuclear power.
Greenham Common revolutionized the language of protest through the use of symbols drawn from domestic life and nature, re-signifying them as tools of psychological and political warfare. The military fence, a symbol of exclusion and secrecy, was transformed into an open-air art gallery.
One of the most powerful symbols was the spider's web. Women wove webs of colored wool across the gates and onto the fences, symbolizing the interconnectedness of life and the fragility that, when united, becomes strength. They attached photographs of their children, baby clothes, flowers, ribbons, and even a wedding dress to the wire mesh, contrasting the "materiality of life" with the abstractness of the nuclear death contained within.
December 12, 1982, marked one of the most iconic actions in the history of global pacifism: "Embrace the Base." Over 30,000 women, mobilized through a meticulous telephone and postal network, surrounded the entire perimeter of the base, holding hands. In a silence broken only by chants, the protesters demonstrated that peaceful determination could literally "encircle" the military machine.
The following year, on April 1, 1983, approximately 70,000 people formed a 14-mile human chain connecting Greenham Common with the Aldermaston nuclear warhead factory and the Burghfield plant. These actions were not just demonstrations of numbers, but collective performances intended to raise public awareness of the pervasiveness of the military-industrial complex throughout British soil.
Greenham's militant creativity often pushed the boundaries of legality, entering the realm of radical civil disobedience. On New Year's Eve 1983, 44 women scaled the fences and danced for hours on top of the missile silos under construction, singing songs of peace under the incredulous eyes of the soldiers. This act mocked the base's notion of "security": if a group of unarmed women could breach the heart of the nuclear sanctuary, then the entire narrative of national defense was a lie.
The women regularly practiced "keening," a traditional howling dirge that disoriented and unnerved the guards. They dressed up as animals-as during the famous "Teddy Bear's Picnic," when they invaded the base dressed as teddy bears-to highlight the absurdity of state violence against civilian life. When arrested, they practiced "passive non-cooperation," making their bodies limp and heavy so that officers had to work incredibly hard to move them.
Greenham's strength lies in the thousands of individual stories woven together in the Berkshire mud. The activists' testimonies reveal a mix of fear, elation, and unwavering determination.
Mary Millington recalls: "The commune itself was beautiful: birch trees, butterflies; but the ugliness of the military might was shocking... that's where they built the silos. Living in the camp gave me a profound connection with the outside world, with the sun, the moon, and the weather." For many, the Greenham experience was a rite of passage toward empowerment: "I gave many public speeches, which I'd never done before, to a packed Manchester Town Hall and even on the Pyramid stage at Glastonbury."
Rebecca Johnson, one of the camp's historic figures, recounts the harsh repression: "The police arrested me and dragged me into the base... it was a terrible time when the first missiles arrived in November 1983." Despite the arrival of the cruise missiles, resistance did not subside. The women intensified their monitoring of the missile convoys attempting to leave the base for nighttime exercises. Through the "Cruisewatch" group, the convoys were tracked, blocked, and photographed, preventing the base from operating in secret.
The state's response was not only judicial, but also included extreme forms of physical and psychological violence. In addition to beatings during evictions, in 1984, disturbing reports began to emerge of the use of radiofrequency weapons against women. Many residents reported unusual symptoms: acute headaches, dizziness, unexplained drowsiness, nausea, ringing in the skull, and even temporary paralysis. An investigation conducted by the Medical Campaign Against Nuclear Weapons detected electromagnetic radiation levels well above ambient near the women's camps at times of particular political tension. Although authorities have always denied the deliberate use of microwaves or infrasound, documented evidence suggests that the base may have tested crowd control technologies on a civilian population of unarmed women. This chapter by Greenham highlights the extent to which the feminist challenge was perceived as an existential threat by the military, justifying the use of experimental warfare technologies against it.
The shockwaves of Greenham Common did not stop at the cliffs of the English Channel. The "Women's Peace Camp" model spread across the world, from Seneca Falls in the United States to Madrid to Sicily. In Italy, the decision to host 112 cruise missiles at Magliocco Airport in Comiso triggered a similar reaction.
In March 1983, inspired by their English comrades, a group of feminists founded the peace camp "La Ragnatela" (The Ragnatela) directly opposite the Comiso base. As in Greenham, the choice was separatism to denounce the connection between male violence, patriarchy, and militarism. Agata Ruscica, one of the founders, describes the "disorientation" of the mixed-gender demonstrations dominated by political parties, where women's demands were stifled. "La Ragnatela" became a space for self-awareness and direct action, where Sicilian women, together with activists from across Europe and overseas, wove webs of colored wool. "La Ragnatela" symbolized the network of relationships, female solidarity, and the commitment to "reining in" war and missiles. The document "Against Nuclear Power and Beyond," drafted by Catania feminists, highlighted how war was merely the supreme extension of the daily violence suffered by women: "Aggression, conquest, possession, control of a woman or a territory, it's all the same." This intersectional analysis linked the struggle against the missiles to the fight against rape and exploitation, making antimilitarist feminism a global threat to order.
Despite the harsh life at the camp, the Greenham women never abandoned formal channels to challenge the state. In 1983, a group of protesters launched the lawsuit Greenham Women Against Cruise Missiles v. Reagan in US federal court in New York. Supported by the Center for Constitutional Rights, the women argued that the deployment of the missiles violated the US Constitution and international law, putting the lives of millions at risk without Congressional consent.
Although the lawsuit did not materially stop the installation, it served to internationalize the conflict and embarrass the Thatcher and Reagan administrations. The constant pressure exerted by peace camps across Europe, combined with geopolitical changes in the Soviet Union with the rise of Gorbachev, eventually led to the signing of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty in 1987.
Cruise missiles began leaving Greenham Common in 1989, and the last device was removed in March 1991, both at Greenham and Comiso. It was a remarkable victory for a movement that had been derided as "fringe" and comprised of "witches and communists." However, the camp did not close immediately. The women remained for another nine years to protest the British Trident program and to ensure that the base would never again be used for nuclear purposes. On September 5, 2000, nineteen years after the march began, the camp closed permanently to make way for a historic memorial site.
The impact of Greenham Common cannot be measured solely in terms of treaties signed or bases dismantled. Its legacy lies in the radical transformation of feminist political practice. Greenham demonstrated that feminism, when it takes action in the antimilitarist field, does not simply demand inclusion in the system, but challenges its very logic.
Patriarchy has historically used the concept of "care" to confine women to the private sphere. Greenham overturned this paradigm, transforming care into a form of public and bellicose resistance. Caring for the planet, one's children, and the common future became the most political act possible, justifying the violation of military borders and the destruction of state property. This "militant motherhood" was not a return to tradition, but its radical politicization.
Greenham was the forerunner of what we now call "craftivism"-the use of manual and domestic labor as a form of protest. Horizontal communication techniques, collective leadership, and the rejection of male hierarchies have influenced generations of subsequent movements.
The story of Greenham Common teaches us that military power, however immense and armed with nuclear warheads, is intrinsically fragile in the face of resistance that rejects its codes. Soldiers and police knew how to manage an enemy army, but they didn't know how to manage thousands of women laughing at them, singing in front of cannons, and spinning wool threads on electrified fences.
Antimilitarist feminism is disruptive because it strips power of its most precious resource: consensus and fear. By refusing to be "protected" by weapons that threaten total destruction, the women of Greenham asserted their own political agenda and demonstrated that conflict need not be solely destructive to be effective.
Greenham Common remains a testament to the fact that when women decide that life is more valuable than national sovereignty or technological power, no fence can keep them out, and no silence can stifle their voice. It ensured that a specific struggle created a space for rethinking themselves, community action, and reality, taken as immutable. Their struggle marked the transition from a feminism of assertiveness to a feminism of total transformation, capable of looking the monster of war in the eye and beginning, with a simple thread of wool, to dismantle it piece by piece.
Cristina
https://umanitanova.org/lesperienza-di-greenham-common-la-dirompente-pratica-dellantimilitarismo-femminista/
_________________________________________
Link: (en) Italy, FAI, Umanita Nova #7-26 - The Greenham Common Experience: The Disruptive Practice of Feminist Antimilitarism (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Source: A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten