59 years ago, on April 1st (April Fool's Day) 1964, a coup process organized some
years before, inside military barracks and high Brazilian business offices, wasunleashed. ---- The 1964 military coup began a period of brutal persecution ofpopular movements, unions and spaces of struggle. He arrested, tortured andmurdered thousands of social fighters, trade unionists, students, indigenouspeople, community activists from the favelas and any voices that attacked themilitary dictatorship that started that year. ---- The Brazilian militarydictatorship gradually hardened its apparatus, whose most violent expression werethe Institutional Acts (AI). Number 5 was enacted at a time when the dictatorshipwas being much more questioned. Published in 1968, AI-5 instituted censorship,closed the national congress, and legalized the "national security" policy, whichdeepened repression throughout the country. The repression apparatuses usedtorture, rape, kidnapping, imprisonment and summary execution as a model of Stateterrorism for a long time.With that, the National Security Doctrine (DSN) was aligned, a violent policy,stimulated by US imperialism that aimed to combat the "internal enemy" throughthe action of military and police forces; this same policy stimulated othermilitary coups in Latin America, such as in Paraguay (1954), Bolivia (1964),Chile (1973), Uruguay (1973) and Argentina (1976). Allied to the imperialistpolicy of the United States, the military regime destroyed the voices ofopposition and inaugurated a period of darkness, not only in Brazil but in otherparts of Latin America. High military ranks were the spearhead of a system ofdomination in its new form.The 1964 coup and the military dictatorship were the expression of theorganization of a reactionary bloc, which united businessmen, politicians,military and extreme right movements, aligned with imperialism and against anypossibility of social reforms in Brazil. It was these coup-acting associations,gathered at the Institute of Research and Social Studies (IPES) and the BrazilianInstitute of Democratic Action (IBAD) that organized the action that ousted JoãoGoulart and installed a military government, strongly supported by the nationalbourgeoisie. These associations financed various reactionary movements, such asthe "Marcha da Família com Deus pela Liberdade" so that Brazilian society wouldthink that the coup had broad popular support.On the eve of the coup, there was a strong popular movement, pushing foragrarian, social, urban and educational reforms, which aimed to reduce the deepinequality of Brazilian peripheral capitalism. These movements manifestedthemselves through specific reforms, in a context of a frankly reformistgovernment, within the framework of the capitalist system.The meaning of the coup and the dictatorship inaugurated in 1964, therefore, wasto prevent any income distribution policies, contain social mobilization,guarantee the interests of imperialism and intensify capitalist exploitation. Nowonder, the average income of the minimum wage plummeted, the participation ofmultinational companies in the Brazilian economy grew exponentially and the lackof mobilization (strikes were punished with imprisonment or disappearance)guaranteed the high profits of the Brazilian bourgeoisie.The more open possibilities of mass struggle having been closed, part of thepolitical organizations of the left migrated to the armed struggle and bravelyfaced the regime, suffering the brutal fury of the worst enemies of the people.Other sectors (such as the PCB) condemned armed action and defended the"democratic struggle".Worn out at the end of the 1970s, the dictatorship began to rehearse a process ofredemocratization, greatly stimulated by the change in political orientation ofthe institutions of power in the United States and rehearsed a great nationalagreement (from top to bottom), which resulted in the Amnesty Law and theredemocratization of the country. The result of this concertation process wasthat the coup and torturer military were granted amnesty, along with the braveguerrillas who were exiled from the country. Impunity marked this process andleaves consequences for our contemporary reality. Several torturers, militarycoup leaders and their sympathizers became part of national politics andtransited in the high circles of the shift governments. Meanwhile, a large partof the left abandoned the perspective of radical transformation and the need fora violent break with this system and adopted an increasingly moderate tone,believing that it would be possible to carry out a profound transformation withgradual changes based on bourgeois democracy.The Bolsonaro government is the result of this conciliation process with coupleaders in suits and uniforms. Bolsonaro is a member of the most reactionarystratum of the military barracks and his political trajectory demonstrates thatthe non-punishment of the coup plotters was a true tragedy for the social life ofthe poorest. Bolsonaro's election was not the work of an individual agent, but isthe result of the action of the uniformed party, coup businessmen and a renewedreactionary bloc. This bloc began to organize itself even more clearly during theDilma government; dissatisfied with the social compensations organized by the PTgovernment (even if small and incapable of jeopardizing the structural privilegesof the dominant classes), they began to rehearse the break with the conciliationgovernment and with social paints. It was with Bolsonaro's candidacy that thispolitical bloc was able to condense into a more concrete movement. As in the1960s, they also aimed to withdraw rights and deepen capitalist exploitation. Nowonder, it was with the legal-parliamentary coup that overthrew Dilma and putTemer in power that the biggest withdrawals of rights were approved, sparing thesenior military officers and their allies. Bolsonaro's election, therefore,becomes part of this offensive, with the attack on social and labor rights, therights of women, indigenous peoples, with the advance of ecocide, repression andmassacres against the black and peripheral population. With his government,Brazil aligned itself in a completely submissive manner with US imperialism andadopted the economic policy of exporting raw materials and commodities as its axis.Even having been defeated at the polls, the coup military and the reactionarybloc are still alive and active. Be it clearly acting as institutional oppositionto the incumbent government, be it inserting itself into the government itselfand mitigating any weak reforms that it prioritizes. And, once again, a largepart of the left continues with institutional illusions, that it is possible todefeat this bloc through institutional apparatuses and without a prolonged struggle.As socialist and libertarian militants, we believe that it is not possible todefeat this bloc without great mass mobilization and reducing the action ofsocial struggles to palace agendas. The political sectors that are in the wake ofPT governmentism make the same error of conciliation and illusions that lead tothe defeat of popular struggles. Reformism disarms the class and prepares thescenarios for the next defeat. The maintenance of a new tax ceiling representsthe surrender of the current government to the financialization of the Brazilianeconomy and its domination by usury of speculation.The power of agribusiness, real estate speculation, the national bourgeoisie, theuniformed party and the neo-Pentecostal churches, which led to the 2016 coup andthe 2018 tragedy remain unchanged. Even under a new round of class conciliation,the current government in turn does not dare to face them, when it does notsupport many of their agendas. As long as the material bases of these sectorsremain intact, their reactionary political expression will continue to be presentin Brazilian society.On this anniversary of the 1964 coup, we must demand the immediate punishment ofthe torturers and guarantee, in social struggles and memories, the permanence ofthe struggle against the dictatorship and its authoritarian debris.Combating the party in uniform and its bourgeois partners does not pass throughthe negotiation table of bourgeois democracy, but through the deepening of thesocial struggle, the occupation of land, occupation of public buildings, closureof roads, stoppages, strikes and combative actions that aim to uproot economicand social reforms.For this we need, as anarchists, to be politically organized and coordinated,with a well-defined perspective of the necessary steps for this transformation.Building or strengthening popular movements (rural and urban), unions (or unionoppositions) and community movements that materialize the necessary social forcefor this endeavor. We know that this is a huge task and that it will not be doneovernight, nor will it be done "spontaneously". We are also sure that this willnot be carried out by a single political organization or popular movement, butwill be the fruit of a much broader process, with which we certainly want tocontribute organizationally and influence its consequences.For the immediate punishment of the torturers and members of the military regime!For the punishment of the scammers of 2023!For the immediate punishment of the Bolsonaro family and the expropriation of alltheir assets!Coletivo Mineiro Popular Anarchista (COMPA-MG)Anarchist Federation of Rio de Janeiro (FARJ)Libertarian Socialist Anarchist Organization (OASL-SP)Libertarian Rusga (RL-MT)Yesterday and today: suits and uniforms against the peoplehttps://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=534450008867726&set=a.285647957081267https://anarquismosp.wordpress.com/2023/04/01/59-anos-do-golpe-ditadura-nunca-mais/_________________________________________A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C EBy, For, and About AnarchistsSend news reports to A-infos-en mailing listA-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten