The armed struggle of the Kurds and their allies in Rojava (1) has aroused
immense enthusiasm and solidarity. Paradoxically, while the Kurdish questionusually mobilized Marxist-Leninist-inspired political groups, the widerlibertarian galaxy became enthusiastic about Kurdish resistance against DAESH andthe Turkish state. From the testimonies of internationalist fighters to the worksof activists or amateur or confirmed geopoliticians, thousands of pages have beenwritten to discuss the policy implemented in the territories under Kurdishcontrol, perceived rightly or wrongly as the embryo of a self-managing society.It would hardly be a caricature to say that some seemed to find there a newSpanish war! Unfortunately, the usual shortcomings of anarchist and/orlibertarian groups, namely producing analyzes and political assessments of theiractions, have been repeated. To our knowledge, there is therefore very littlefeedback from the solidarity campaigns initiated (with their successes orfailures). Today, the latter seem to be reduced to a fetishism of the Amazon witha Kalashnikov (2)How to explain it?The difficulty obviously comes from the distance (Rojava is far away), thecircumstances (it is a conflict zone), the language barrier but also and aboveall from the lack of knowledge of Kurdish society in general. Finally, it is theresult of the general lack of interest in questions of national liberationstruggles and anti-imperialism, themes that are little discussed among anarchistmilitants.It is clear that the Kurdish community has always been subject to continuouspressure from the French state (arrests, expulsions, dissolution of itsrepresentative organizations) and regular attacks from the Turkish services andits associates. But it is only on the occasion of spectacular tragedies, such asthe attack last December on the Ahmet Kaya cultural center on rue d'Enghien inParis (3) that the "Kurdish problem" comes back into the news. .However, it is through work and concrete solidarity with the Kurdish diasporathat we could measure whether it carries in its political and community demands aproject that could be related to an egalitarian and libertarian society. It is inthe practice of this solidarity that we could forge links and understand how theKurdish diaspora mobilizes in France and in Europe, what relations it maintainswith the organization of the PKK. Finally, it is through this solidarity that wecould deploy our own criticisms against the policy of the French governments anddenounce the instrumentalization of which the Kurds are victims in the diplomaticgame between Turkey and the European Union.The Kurdish DiasporaThere is no census of Kurds in Europe. The most common estimates state thepresence of approximately 1.5 to 1.7 million Kurds in Western Europe.80% of European Kurds come from Turkey. But this rate has been changingsignificantly since 2015. Iraqi Kurds form large communities in Great Britain,the Netherlands, the United States and Sweden. Syrian Kurds are growing in numberin Germany, France and Sweden. This, due to a generous immigration policyinitiated by Olof Palme and material incentives for publishing and creation, wasable to attract a large part of the Kurdish intelligentsia. This is how thelargest Kurdish-language library in the world was opened in Sweden. In addition,the Swedish multicultural model (one can follow school education in one's mothertongue) is conducive to motivating immigration. But this policy is currentlybeing challenged. Indeed, in May 2022, Sweden and Finland asked to join NATO.What seemed at first glance a mere formality turned into a real dilemma. Erdoganvetoed these candidacies, as long as the countries did not fulfill hisrequirements in terms of welcoming Kurdish populations whom he considers close tothe PKK. Sweden granted some of Erdogan's demands, including the expulsion ofKurdish nationals from Turkey.The formation of a diaspora in Europe is a recent phenomenon. In the 1960s, Kurdsfrom Turkey arrived first in Germany and then in the Benelux countries, Austria,Switzerland and France as workers under the intergovernmental agreements onimmigrant labour. Thus, France signed an agreement with Turkey in 1965facilitating immigration. The community now has 250,000 members in France.The migratory movement, linked to work, is then perceived as temporary: it is thework of single men, with a phenomenon that is called "mchery", that is to say thefact of joining people from one's own region of origin. For example in Rennes,more than half of the Kurds come from the same village! This practice obviouslystrengthens the community link in both its positive (solidarity) and negative(the weight of the community) points.In the 1970s, the Kurdish migratory movement merges into that of Turkish workerimmigration, the Kurds unionize but do not question Turkish politics for tworeasons: the first is that the Turkish state sent them to the framework of workagreements which represents an opportunity for them and the second is a strongsense of national belonging.The end of these agreements at the end of the 1970s led to the obtaining ofpapers (the great clothing strike in the Sentier). And the emergence in Turkey inthe 1980s of the "Kurdish question" would strongly politicize the diaspora.The military coups of 1971 and 1980 in Turkey will give rise to a real"transnationalization" of Turkish political organizations. For the Kurds thisphenomenon is continuous and will increase throughout the following decades.Following the Islamic Revolution in Iran in 1979, the long Iraq-Iran conflict andthe campaign of extermination of the Kurds (Anfal) launched by the Iraqi regime,successive waves of Kurdish political refugees arrived in the countries ofWestern Europe. The launch in 1992 of the campaign to evacuate and destroyKurdish villages, and, from 2011, the civil war in Syria maximized the Kurdishexodus to Europe.Millions of Kurds have therefore been forced into exile, first to large regionalcities such as Istanbul (3 million Kurds), Izmir, Adana in Turkey, Baghdad inIraq, Tehran and Tabriz in Iran, then to countries previously cited. Nearly athird of Kurds therefore currently live outside Kurdistan.It is therefore through migration that the (re)discovery of Kurdishness will beplayed out. It is through the arrival of political refugees oppressed by thenegation of their culture in Turkey that the national identity of "expatriates"will be redefined. The Kurdish diaspora therefore plays a major cultural andpolitical role. It was she who was able to give new impetus to the writtenlanguage, literature and Kurdish music, which are banned in Turkey, and to arousein this country a renewed interest in its culture. She has also played animportant political role in informing Western opinion of the fate of the Kurds inthe various countries where they are persecuted.After a period of trial and error, the Kurdish diaspora is gradually setting upits own institutions. This is the case of the Democratic Council of the Kurds ofFrance, target of the attack of January.The Kurds and the PKKThe Partiya Karkeren Kurdistan (Kurdistan Workers' Party) was founded in November1978 in Turkey. Its structuring took place beforehand abroad, mainly in Europe,but also in refugee camps such as those in Lebanon, Kurds will thus joinPalestinian organizations. This back and forth movement, one would be tempted towrite interior/exterior, is essential to understanding the dynamics at work inthe politicization and practices of the community. It greatly contributes to thepolitical culture of Kurdish militants. From the start, the PKK had an armed branch, the HRK, which would later becomethe ARGK (Kurdish People's Liberation Army). At the time, the PKK was just onemore organization in the Kurdish political field and in the TurkishMarxist-Leninist far left. It was the outbreak of the armed struggle in August1984 (attack on military barracks and takeover of Kurdish villages) that won himsympathy and respect among the Kurds of immigration. The PKK succeeds in thepassage of the discourse on the armed struggle to the military confrontation.This is an essential point: the Kurds are now able to defend themselves. Theyalso find through support for the PKK a concrete outlet for their commitment(support, solidarity network, funding, etc.). In 1985, the PKK built a culturaland social front, the ERNK (National Liberation Movement of Kurdistan). In 1987,the armed struggle intensified, it was the "Sedilhan" (the uprising).Joining the PKK is a life choice, the militants are all executives (cadros),celibacy is required and the commitment is for life. When you join the PKK, youtake on another identity and a nom de guerre. Going through prison and torture,the culture of martyrdom (Shahid) adds to the mystique and contributes to thepowerful image (both positive and negative) that the PKK sends back to thecommunity. The PKK militants obviously play to the fullest on this mystique. Itis therefore very difficult for a Kurd to criticize the PKK, we willsystematically refer to him the sacrifice of the militants and the work carriedout by the latter.Protest in Canada in VancouverIn recent years the PKK has renovated its ideological framework, in its writingsand its positions, its leader Abdullah Ocalan, has developed a new doctrine ofdemocratic confederalism combining libertarian municipalism, ecology andfeminism, drawing inspiration in this from the work of the American MurrayBookchin with whom he would have maintained extensive correspondence from hisplace of incarceration.In 1999, under pressure from the Turkish state, the PKK was added to the list ofterrorist organizations by the United States and the European Union.France and the Kurdish communityIt is estimated that one in five Kurds is "politicized", that is to say capableof mobilizing on community issues. 160,000 voters went to the polls in the lastelections; the results gave the majority to Erdogan's party (60%), thepro-Kurdish party HDP won 30% of the vote. If we cannot measure the vote, thisresult nevertheless indicates that the Kurds are not spontaneously "progressive"there is even a large base of "pro-Turkish" Kurds often from the rural world,attached to order and to stability.The French state has always blown hot and cold, turning a blind eye to the entryof PKK cadets: it has been able to use the right of asylum to ensure them aminimum of tranquility, and has not, however, deprived itself to use theanti-terrorism map to ensure permanent control over militants, particularly onthe issue of funding. It is the indictment for extortion in relation to aterrorist enterprise which is the preferred card of the services, it also makesit possible to freeze the assets of Kurdish associations thus paralyzing theiractions. Thus in 1993, the FEYK, the first attempt at a Kurdish organization andan association under the law of 1901, was dissolved. Remember that it was notuntil 1999 that the PKK was declared terrorist. The expulsions of activists makeit possible to weigh on diplomacy with the Turkish state according to currentrelations. Other times, the services can turn a blind eye to the actions ofTurkish nationalist groups or Turkish services in their repression againstactivists, as in 2013 during the assassination of activists on rue Lafayette.Second generationThe children of the first Kurdish immigrants are now taking up the torch, tornbetween the weight of the heritage and the possibility of new victories. Theyhave advantages over the previous generation; the majority of young Kurds are nolonger confined to hard and arduous jobs. Their assimilation through mastery ofthe French language and access to studies allowed them a certain socialelevation. Socializing with other activists during demonstrations and othersupport initiatives gave them an opportunity to break out of the isolation thatcommunity mobilization can sometimes entail and to open up their politicalquestioning. It is therefore with this new generation and on the strength of thesuccesses of the previous one that we will have to work to perhaps finally getthe Kurdish minority out of the systematic oppression in which it is locked up.Jean MouloudRatings(1) Western Kurdistan (Rojava means west in Kurdish) has been a de factoautonomous region since November 2013. It is home to 2.2 million Kurds,representing 10% of the Syrian population. Rojava takes up all of northern Syriaand is made up of three cantons: Afrin (in the west), Kobané (in the center) andCizire (also called Jazira, in the east). The movement that controls Rojava isthe PYD (Democratic Union Party), a sister organization of the PKK.(2) Do not be mistaken, it is not a question of distributing the good and the badpoints, we are just as responsible for this deficiency, by way of example, theauthor of these lines participating from the first hour in the attempts to set upa Parisian support group does not exonerate itself from this lack of results.(3) Exactly 10 years after the assassination of three Kurdish activists by anindividual linked to the Turkish secret services and for which the French Staterefuses to lift the defense secret on the elements of the investigation.http://oclibertaire.lautre.net/spip.php?article3637_________________________________________A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C EBy, For, and About AnarchistsSend news reports to A-infos-en mailing listA-infos-en@ainfos.caSPREAD THE INFORMATION
Any information or special reports about various countries may be published with photos/videos on the world blog with bold legit source. All languages are welcome. Mail to lucschrijvers@hotmail.com.
Together, we can turn words into action. If you believe in independent voices and meaningful impact
Autobiography Luc Schrijvers Ebook €5 - Amazon
Search for an article in this Worldwide information blog
Abonneren op:
Reacties posten (Atom)
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten