The 28 points-even if they are part of an absolutely provisional
draft-that should mark the end of the war in Ukraine, agreed upon by the
Americans and Russians in great secrecy in a luxury hotel in Florida,
mark a success for the United States, which wanted the war. They satisfy
Russian strategic interests, punish the EU for its foolishness, and mark
the defeat of Ukrainian nationalism. If this is the political outcome of
the affair, it must also be said that the agreement puts an end to the
lucrative activities of Ukrainian oligarchs who profited from war
funding and enriched themselves through the arms trade, selling the
money received for fighting, fueling the many war theaters around the
world and organized crime, speculating on military supplies, and
demanding bribes for the management of the energy system. But fear not,
a new market is opening up for them: that of profiting from the
reconstruction of Ukraine, tapping into the river of money that will
flow into the country as a result of the agreements to be signed.
While it's true that the Ukrainian oligarchs land on their feet, the
same isn't true for Zelensky, who has been held by the Americans since
the beginning of the war. The United States, the perfidious sponsor of
the conflict, brought in two anti-corruption agencies, which, at the
opportune moment, revealed the divisive and appropriative activities of
the President and his entourage: as if to say "assholes, but not fools!"
The United States knew full well, ever since they infiltrated the
country via the Maidan riots, that they were dealing with a country
where corruption reigns supreme and that the various individuals
involved in the operation would do anything to enrich themselves
personally. So they took precautions, equipping themselves with a tool
to pull the plug at the opportune moment. The naive ones in this project
were the European Union countries, led by Great Britain, which, for its
own dirty interests in balancing power within Europe, involved the Union
in a risky and disastrous clash against its economic interests. The aim
was to balkanize Russia, destabilize it, and transform it, through
institutional change, into a constellation of small states to be managed
and exploited, cultivating dreams of a rebirth of British hegemony and a
reimagining of the empire in another form.
The British had not calculated that Trump could rise to power and
abandon them in the name of American interests, putting an end to the
heterodox influence British policy exerted on US policy. Furthermore,
the British have been able to take advantage of a foolish and cowardly
European Union political class, crowded with rotten leaders like Macron
and Merz, dominated by the Baltics, among whom Kaja Kretina Kallas
stands out. She is conspicuous for her stupidity and ignorance and, like
her other associates, is driven by anti-Russian hatred, despite having
not shied away from doing business with Russia in the past; see the
activities of Kallas's husband, who made profits from trading with that
country even after the war began.
Why now?
Because all this is happening right now. The fact, ignored and hidden by
the Western press, is that Russia, which was said to fight with shovels,
which stole chips from Ukrainian washing machines because they were
unarmed and technologically backward, is winning on the battlefield,
clashing on a front equipped for war with long-standing NATO, and
especially British, penetration into Ukraine. Since 2014, NATO has
fortified the cities of Donbass, transforming them into entrenched camps
designed to block the Russian army in a war of position and attrition.
Now that Russia, after an initial disarray due to its underestimation of
the Ukrainian internal situation and its preparation for war, has
reorganized its army, restarted its weapons systems production,
mobilized its financial resources, enabled its economy to withstand the
Western embargo, and indeed has drawn from this opportunity to develop
its economy, the Russian army has been able to implement a strategy of
methodical siege and outflanking of Ukrainian positions. The repeated
creation of pockets is causing Ukrainian strongholds to collapse one
after another, massacring its army, foolishly engaged in all-out
resistance operations, waiting for lifesaving aid that has not arrived
and could only come at the risk of nuclear war.
Pokrovsk and its twin city Myrnohrad have fallen despite all strenuous
resistance and the sacrifices of Ukrainian soldiers. The same has
happened in Kupyansk and is about to happen to Siversk, while Lyman is
about to be taken. The Russian army has a path open to Slovyansk and
Kramatorsk, the last two cities in Donbass. Kramatorsk is partially
overrun, and all this while in Zaporizhia Oblast, Hulyajpole and Orichiv
are about to fall: the road to the capital city is open and unhindered.
Ukrainian desertions are growing so dramatically that the country is
forced into forced mobilization and, according to Merz, should call up
young people between the ages of 18 and 25, after Ukraine has lost half
of its pre-war population to flight or emigration, now that the
infrastructure is destroyed and the economy is non-existent; now that US
interests have changed and are being managed In pursuit of maximum
profit to address a domestic US economic and social crisis worthy of an
empire's end, negotiations become urgent and inevitable. The disgusting
cynicism of European politicians who want the extinction of the
Ukrainian people is disgusting!
Seen in hindsight, the Anchorage, Alaska, meeting marked a profound
shift in the international political strategy of the United States and
Russia and ushered in a new phase of exchanges of courtesies and favors,
most recently the withdrawal of the Russian-Chinese motion on Gaza and
Palestine, initially opposed to the solution proposed by Trump, which
later resulted in abstention, in exchange for recognition of their
respective spheres of influence. In this new arrangement between the two
countries, Ukrainian nationalism has no place and must perish.
Although this shift in Russian-American political orientation is evident
to everyone, it is the European and British leaders who have failed to
grasp it and persist in planning the intervention of the so-called
"willing" who, in effect, still invite Zelensky opposed the US request,
advising them to recall the thousands of young people who fled abroad to
fight and be massacred, thus carrying out the extermination of the
Ukrainian population in the name of the political careers of decrepit
leaders distrustful of their own public opinion and living in a rotten
state of power.
The Points of the Agreement
The 28 points constitute a starting point for negotiations between the
US and Russia and, to this end, must be accepted first by Ukraine. It
should be noted that, at least at present, the European Union and the
Ukrainians are excluded from the negotiations, and "if you're not at the
negotiating table, it's because you're on the menu" (J. Wuttke, but also
W. Churchill).
The first part of the document is dedicated to Ukraine's sovereignty,
the guarantees granted, and explicitly states NATO's commitment not to
deploy troops within the country. However, the agreement is unclear
regarding this commitment, given that once the promise of membership is
fulfilled, Ukraine's accession to the European Union could rightfully,
in the name of European sovereignty, deploy its own troops in Ukraine.
This consideration immediately raises another ambiguity in the draft,
given that it establishes that Ukraine will be granted a fast-track path
to accession to the European Union. That said, it is unclear how an
international agreement can establish such a commitment on the part of a
subject of international law without it being a party to the agreement,
even if this can be explained by the fact that the United States
considers the European Union states to be vassal states. In any case,
this would violate EU rules regarding the accession of countries to the
European Union, which must meet certain conditions for accession.
Incidentally, by requiring Ukraine to join the European Union, the
United States is creating the conditions for a profound crisis in the
European Union, which would see the entry of a country that absolutely
does not meet the conditions for accession and that, based on EU rules
that channel budgets to finance agricultural policy, would see
agriculture Ukraine's advantage, to the detriment of the agriculture of
EU countries, or at least some of them.
This is not to mention the consequences for compliance with the rule of
law, given that Ukraine is notoriously illiberal and deeply corrupt.
Further ambiguity lies in Ukraine's commitment to reduce the size of its
army, which is expected to settle at 600,000 men, a number incompatible
with the financial management of such a large number of armed soldiers,
unless it is financed with EU funds. The reported number, however, seems
inconsistent with the prospect of neutralizing and disarming the
country. Proof of this is the fact that another version speaks of
60,000. Before addressing future territorial arrangements, Article 20 of
the draft deals with so-called denazification, establishing that: "Both
countries undertake to implement educational programs in schools and
throughout society that promote understanding and tolerance of different
cultures and eliminate racism and prejudice.
Ukraine will adopt EU standards on religious tolerance and linguistic
minorities;
Both countries agree to abolish all measures aimed at guaranteeing the
rights of Ukrainian and Russian media and education.
All Nazi ideology and activity must be rejected and prohibited."
This part of the draft is aimed at targeting Ukrainian nationalism, but
is extremely ambiguous, especially in point a. It refers to EU rules on
religious tolerance, considering the damage the Ukrainian war has
already caused to the structure of Church-State relations within the
European Union, leading to the prevalence of a neo-jurisdictionalist and
confessional approach to the management of these relations in many
countries.[1]
Final Considerations
We are currently unable to predict future developments in the
negotiations, but what is certain is that all the conditions are in
place for the United States to definitively withdraw from the conflict,
deriving considerable economic and strategic gains from it. The EU will
emerge with its bones broken, economically and politically, as its
disappearance as an autonomous entity under international law is
sanctioned and its economic role is significantly diminished.
The fact remains that if the US initiative fails, as is likely, the
issue will be resolved on the battlefield and will nevertheless mark the
significant territorial reduction of the Ukrainian state, its defeat on
the battlefield, and further deaths and ruins. Rather than the
Ukrainians, it should be the rotten and incompetent European leaders who
reflect and bear the consequences of their irresponsible foolishness.
Gianni Cimbalo
https://www.ucadi.org/2025/11/30/ucraina-la-sconfitta-delleuropa/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
draft-that should mark the end of the war in Ukraine, agreed upon by the
Americans and Russians in great secrecy in a luxury hotel in Florida,
mark a success for the United States, which wanted the war. They satisfy
Russian strategic interests, punish the EU for its foolishness, and mark
the defeat of Ukrainian nationalism. If this is the political outcome of
the affair, it must also be said that the agreement puts an end to the
lucrative activities of Ukrainian oligarchs who profited from war
funding and enriched themselves through the arms trade, selling the
money received for fighting, fueling the many war theaters around the
world and organized crime, speculating on military supplies, and
demanding bribes for the management of the energy system. But fear not,
a new market is opening up for them: that of profiting from the
reconstruction of Ukraine, tapping into the river of money that will
flow into the country as a result of the agreements to be signed.
While it's true that the Ukrainian oligarchs land on their feet, the
same isn't true for Zelensky, who has been held by the Americans since
the beginning of the war. The United States, the perfidious sponsor of
the conflict, brought in two anti-corruption agencies, which, at the
opportune moment, revealed the divisive and appropriative activities of
the President and his entourage: as if to say "assholes, but not fools!"
The United States knew full well, ever since they infiltrated the
country via the Maidan riots, that they were dealing with a country
where corruption reigns supreme and that the various individuals
involved in the operation would do anything to enrich themselves
personally. So they took precautions, equipping themselves with a tool
to pull the plug at the opportune moment. The naive ones in this project
were the European Union countries, led by Great Britain, which, for its
own dirty interests in balancing power within Europe, involved the Union
in a risky and disastrous clash against its economic interests. The aim
was to balkanize Russia, destabilize it, and transform it, through
institutional change, into a constellation of small states to be managed
and exploited, cultivating dreams of a rebirth of British hegemony and a
reimagining of the empire in another form.
The British had not calculated that Trump could rise to power and
abandon them in the name of American interests, putting an end to the
heterodox influence British policy exerted on US policy. Furthermore,
the British have been able to take advantage of a foolish and cowardly
European Union political class, crowded with rotten leaders like Macron
and Merz, dominated by the Baltics, among whom Kaja Kretina Kallas
stands out. She is conspicuous for her stupidity and ignorance and, like
her other associates, is driven by anti-Russian hatred, despite having
not shied away from doing business with Russia in the past; see the
activities of Kallas's husband, who made profits from trading with that
country even after the war began.
Why now?
Because all this is happening right now. The fact, ignored and hidden by
the Western press, is that Russia, which was said to fight with shovels,
which stole chips from Ukrainian washing machines because they were
unarmed and technologically backward, is winning on the battlefield,
clashing on a front equipped for war with long-standing NATO, and
especially British, penetration into Ukraine. Since 2014, NATO has
fortified the cities of Donbass, transforming them into entrenched camps
designed to block the Russian army in a war of position and attrition.
Now that Russia, after an initial disarray due to its underestimation of
the Ukrainian internal situation and its preparation for war, has
reorganized its army, restarted its weapons systems production,
mobilized its financial resources, enabled its economy to withstand the
Western embargo, and indeed has drawn from this opportunity to develop
its economy, the Russian army has been able to implement a strategy of
methodical siege and outflanking of Ukrainian positions. The repeated
creation of pockets is causing Ukrainian strongholds to collapse one
after another, massacring its army, foolishly engaged in all-out
resistance operations, waiting for lifesaving aid that has not arrived
and could only come at the risk of nuclear war.
Pokrovsk and its twin city Myrnohrad have fallen despite all strenuous
resistance and the sacrifices of Ukrainian soldiers. The same has
happened in Kupyansk and is about to happen to Siversk, while Lyman is
about to be taken. The Russian army has a path open to Slovyansk and
Kramatorsk, the last two cities in Donbass. Kramatorsk is partially
overrun, and all this while in Zaporizhia Oblast, Hulyajpole and Orichiv
are about to fall: the road to the capital city is open and unhindered.
Ukrainian desertions are growing so dramatically that the country is
forced into forced mobilization and, according to Merz, should call up
young people between the ages of 18 and 25, after Ukraine has lost half
of its pre-war population to flight or emigration, now that the
infrastructure is destroyed and the economy is non-existent; now that US
interests have changed and are being managed In pursuit of maximum
profit to address a domestic US economic and social crisis worthy of an
empire's end, negotiations become urgent and inevitable. The disgusting
cynicism of European politicians who want the extinction of the
Ukrainian people is disgusting!
Seen in hindsight, the Anchorage, Alaska, meeting marked a profound
shift in the international political strategy of the United States and
Russia and ushered in a new phase of exchanges of courtesies and favors,
most recently the withdrawal of the Russian-Chinese motion on Gaza and
Palestine, initially opposed to the solution proposed by Trump, which
later resulted in abstention, in exchange for recognition of their
respective spheres of influence. In this new arrangement between the two
countries, Ukrainian nationalism has no place and must perish.
Although this shift in Russian-American political orientation is evident
to everyone, it is the European and British leaders who have failed to
grasp it and persist in planning the intervention of the so-called
"willing" who, in effect, still invite Zelensky opposed the US request,
advising them to recall the thousands of young people who fled abroad to
fight and be massacred, thus carrying out the extermination of the
Ukrainian population in the name of the political careers of decrepit
leaders distrustful of their own public opinion and living in a rotten
state of power.
The Points of the Agreement
The 28 points constitute a starting point for negotiations between the
US and Russia and, to this end, must be accepted first by Ukraine. It
should be noted that, at least at present, the European Union and the
Ukrainians are excluded from the negotiations, and "if you're not at the
negotiating table, it's because you're on the menu" (J. Wuttke, but also
W. Churchill).
The first part of the document is dedicated to Ukraine's sovereignty,
the guarantees granted, and explicitly states NATO's commitment not to
deploy troops within the country. However, the agreement is unclear
regarding this commitment, given that once the promise of membership is
fulfilled, Ukraine's accession to the European Union could rightfully,
in the name of European sovereignty, deploy its own troops in Ukraine.
This consideration immediately raises another ambiguity in the draft,
given that it establishes that Ukraine will be granted a fast-track path
to accession to the European Union. That said, it is unclear how an
international agreement can establish such a commitment on the part of a
subject of international law without it being a party to the agreement,
even if this can be explained by the fact that the United States
considers the European Union states to be vassal states. In any case,
this would violate EU rules regarding the accession of countries to the
European Union, which must meet certain conditions for accession.
Incidentally, by requiring Ukraine to join the European Union, the
United States is creating the conditions for a profound crisis in the
European Union, which would see the entry of a country that absolutely
does not meet the conditions for accession and that, based on EU rules
that channel budgets to finance agricultural policy, would see
agriculture Ukraine's advantage, to the detriment of the agriculture of
EU countries, or at least some of them.
This is not to mention the consequences for compliance with the rule of
law, given that Ukraine is notoriously illiberal and deeply corrupt.
Further ambiguity lies in Ukraine's commitment to reduce the size of its
army, which is expected to settle at 600,000 men, a number incompatible
with the financial management of such a large number of armed soldiers,
unless it is financed with EU funds. The reported number, however, seems
inconsistent with the prospect of neutralizing and disarming the
country. Proof of this is the fact that another version speaks of
60,000. Before addressing future territorial arrangements, Article 20 of
the draft deals with so-called denazification, establishing that: "Both
countries undertake to implement educational programs in schools and
throughout society that promote understanding and tolerance of different
cultures and eliminate racism and prejudice.
Ukraine will adopt EU standards on religious tolerance and linguistic
minorities;
Both countries agree to abolish all measures aimed at guaranteeing the
rights of Ukrainian and Russian media and education.
All Nazi ideology and activity must be rejected and prohibited."
This part of the draft is aimed at targeting Ukrainian nationalism, but
is extremely ambiguous, especially in point a. It refers to EU rules on
religious tolerance, considering the damage the Ukrainian war has
already caused to the structure of Church-State relations within the
European Union, leading to the prevalence of a neo-jurisdictionalist and
confessional approach to the management of these relations in many
countries.[1]
Final Considerations
We are currently unable to predict future developments in the
negotiations, but what is certain is that all the conditions are in
place for the United States to definitively withdraw from the conflict,
deriving considerable economic and strategic gains from it. The EU will
emerge with its bones broken, economically and politically, as its
disappearance as an autonomous entity under international law is
sanctioned and its economic role is significantly diminished.
The fact remains that if the US initiative fails, as is likely, the
issue will be resolved on the battlefield and will nevertheless mark the
significant territorial reduction of the Ukrainian state, its defeat on
the battlefield, and further deaths and ruins. Rather than the
Ukrainians, it should be the rotten and incompetent European leaders who
reflect and bear the consequences of their irresponsible foolishness.
Gianni Cimbalo
https://www.ucadi.org/2025/11/30/ucraina-la-sconfitta-delleuropa/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten