It's not a reform, it's a step-by-step structural transformation: schools are increasingly being subjected to the market, stripped of their critical function, and made increasingly unequal. We're not simply facing a new era of reforms. What's happening under Minister Valditara's leadership is a genuine political project to redefine Italian public schools. A coherent, systematic project, carried forward seamlessly from previous governments, which aims to transform education from a universal right to a tool that serves the needs of the market.
Schools Reduced to a Labor FactoryThe heart of this project is the corporatization of education. With the "4+2" model, the strengthening of school-work alternation, and the structural inclusion of businesses in training programs, schools are gradually being transformed into a production chain.
Students are no longer subjects in training, but workers in training. They don't train informed citizens, but individuals ready to adapt to a precarious, underpaid, and rights-deprived labor market.
Behind the rhetoric of "employability" lies a simple truth: the level of education is being lowered to adapt to an economic system incapable of providing decent work.
Technical Education Under Attack
First, the transformation of the so-called "4+2 curriculum" into a "regular curriculum" (after just two years of experimentation and a small number of courses launched). Now we have the reorganization of five-year curricula with radical changes to timetables and teaching structure: these two measures mark a profound turning point that if fully implemented would overturn the functions of the secondary school system.
The two "reforms" reduce knowledge and cut school time, bending the purposes of technical education to corporate logic. They want us to believe that in less time, we would learn more and better. This is not "modernization," but a return to a past in which certain educational programs were entirely instrumental to the needs of the labor market.
Less knowledge and more obedience
Reducing school hours and cutting subjects are not neutral measures. They are political tools. Fewer hours, less content, and less depth mean less critical thinking.
At the same time, an authoritarian model is being strengthened: conduct grades are used as a tool of exclusion, harsher disciplinary sanctions, and the centrality of respect for authority. School is no longer a place for democratic debate and growth, but a space for control and normalization.
A school that teaches obedience is perfectly functional for a labor market that demands flexibility, adaptation, and silence.
The destruction of the unity of the public system
The expansion of curricular autonomy and flexibility marks another crucial step: the breakdown of the national unity of education. Regional LEP (essential levels of performance) were already being envisioned in the wake of differentiated autonomy.
Each school becomes a system in itself, shaped by the needs of the local community, that is, local businesses. The result is growing fragmentation: qualifications with varying values, unequal pathways, divergent opportunities.
It is the end of the idea of public schools as a tool for equality. In its place, a system that reproduces and amplifies social and territorial inequalities.
Businesses within schools: a paradigm shift
With the "Educational Pacts 4.0," businesses are firmly established in schools, no longer as interlocutors but as co-protagonists. They can influence content, curriculum, and methodologies.
This is a momentous shift: education is no longer guided by autonomous educational goals, but by economic interests. Schools are losing cultural and pedagogical sovereignty.
Meanwhile, teachers continue to be asked for qualifications, certifications, and sacrifices, while those in the manufacturing sector are recognized as having an educational role without any equivalent. This is a clear devaluation of the teaching role.
Reducing school time means undermining basic knowledge, thus contributing to the process of cultural decline. The reorganization includes cutting the humanities and sciences, resulting in the disarticulation of disciplinary knowledge.
A school of early exploitation
Lowering the age for activating School-Work Training projects to 15 turns students into laborers to be trained at no cost, before they have even had the opportunity to achieve the necessary critical maturity.
A corporatized school
The proposal is for an educational model subservient to the contingent needs of local businesses, forgetting that schools should train citizens, not simply a workforce. Evidence of this is the de facto imposition of skills-based teaching and UDA (units of learning) as the only acceptable methodology, and the requirement to enter into agreements with businesses to ensure that "experts from the business world" enter the classroom.
UDA, while true, simplifies and is much more practical, it can be more superficial, less in-depth, and burdens teaching planning. In all theoretical subjects, or the theoretical parts of disciplines, mathematics and grammar are not applicable. They reduce and simplify content it's no coincidence that this is the model being used to create vocational school textbooks.
Cuts, precariousness, and structural impoverishment
All this is happening while resources are being reduced. System cuts, school downsizing, mergers: fewer schools, larger, less rooted in the local community.
Staff insecurity remains unresolved, and salaries continue to decline. The structure is being reformed, but the people who bring it to life every day are being abandoned.
It's a clear strategy: weaken the public sector to make it permeable to private interests.
A school of redundancies
In addition to the reduction in teaching quality, there is a reduction in teaching positions. The reduction in annual teaching hours in the reorganization of five-year curricula and the incessant ministerial propaganda for the implementation of 4+2 curricula will lead to redundancies and excess staff. Cowardly in the name of vaunted flexibility and autonomy individual teachers were asked to decide in their colleges which competitive exam class would be cut: they pitted us against each other by asking us to decide which colleague would lose their job!
A School of Improvisation
The launch of the timetable reorganization, in the absence of subject guidelines and with the opposition of the CSPI (National Council of Public Education), which urges the administration to consider the decree temporary, limiting its validity to the next school year, will seriously damage the new technical curricula, undermining the seriousness that has always characterized this historic segment of the education system.
The teaching staff, urgently convened to decide how to allocate the "flexible" hours, were forced by the timing to do so for the first year only, forgoing a comprehensive view of the entire five-year curriculum. Furthermore, the reform is being implemented after enrollment has closed, when families have already made their high school choices based on a curriculum that will be completely overhauled over the course of the five-year period.
A School Tailored to Business
Giving individual schools broad flexibility in organizing their curricula (to meet local production needs!) will make each institution's educational offerings unique. This dismantles the principle of a first two-year program with strongly shared features in technical majors, forcing students to make an early and uninformed choice of specialization as early as middle school. Furthermore, this much-vaunted flexibility jeopardizes the comparability of students' preparation in similar majors, thus undermining the legal value of the qualification.
A School of Class
Finally, this reform solidifies inequalities: those who choose technical education, from now on, will be prematurely directed toward rigid professional paths, severely limiting their chances of continuing university studies or changing their future direction. School ceases to be a right and a tool for emancipation, becoming an educational service subservient to the logic and demands of the market.
The Big Lie: "It's the School's Fault"
The same mantra is always repeated to justify these policies: school doesn't prepare for work, school is inefficient, school needs to change.
But the reality is different. Youth unemployment, job insecurity, and low wages are not the result of education, but of an economic system incapable of guaranteeing rights and prospects.
Placing these responsibilities on schools only serves to legitimize their corporate transformation.
A Political, Not a Technical Choice
There is no neutrality in these reforms. Every choice from curricula to discipline, from relationships with businesses to cuts responds to a specific vision of society.
A society in which:
* education does not emancipate, but selects;
* knowledge does not liberate, but serves;
* school is not a right, but an economic investment.
Resistance is Necessary
Faced with this scenario, analyzing is not enough. We must take a stand.
Defending public schools today means defending:
* the universal right to education,
* the critical function of knowledge,
* equal opportunity,
* the dignity of educational work.
It means rejecting a transformation that empties school of its deepest meaning.
Because a school reduced to a tool of the market is no longer school. It's something else entirely. And accepting this without conflict means handing the future of education and society over to a logic that has nothing to do with democracy, inclusion, and the fundamental egalitarianism toward which schools aspire.
We continue to pursue the myth of professionalism at the expense of equality.
https://alternativalibertaria.fdca.it/wpAL/
_________________________________________
Source: A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten