Starmer's resignation confirms the profound crisis of Great Britain, which refuses to accept the end of its empire and, eager to rebuild its own area of colonial exploitation, aspires to the fragmentation of the Russian state, turning its immense territory into a constellation of ethnic republics, sufficiently weak to offer themselves up to the exploitation of Western European countries, and Great Britain in particular. This objective is part of the British foreign policy vision (now shared by the entire ruling class of the European Union) and is unanimously shared by both the Labour Party and the Conservatives, which explains the perseverance and continuity with which it is pursued; it is the fundamental reason why Britain has armed and supported Ukraine and done everything to provoke conflict with Russia. Historically, Great Britain's aggression towards Russia dates back to 1919 and began precisely in the Donbass region.
In achieving this goal, England has ended up exhausting its economic reserves and weakening itself, especially after the City of London lost control of the Federal Reserve's policies.Today, the United Kingdom has a collapsing economy, a navy made up of rusty tramps for which crews cannot be found, while the very unity of the Kingdom is faltering under the pressure of regionalism. The crisis of its industrial and demographic systems, and the multiethnic composition of a large portion of its populations, fuel a state of emergency in the country, its education system, and its logistics structures, shaking up and challenging the maintenance of public order. Cultural and ethnic conflict among residents is at breaking point. Its secret services and the hidden apparatus of the state are, or almost, a paragon of efficiency.
Starmer's crisis represents the latest stage in a succession of seven governments since Brexit and four since the start of the war in Ukraine. The fact is that the country's economy is unable to sustain the war effort, and therefore the consequences of the negative economic situation and budget deficit are being felt by the increasingly degraded welfare system, the collapse of privatized public transport, the loss of competitiveness of the country's economic system, and the impoverishment of the less well-off classes.
The glorious British working class, militarily defeated by the joint action of Thatcher and Blair, thought it had found in Starmer the leader who could revive the country's fortunes. But he was unable to abandon the bipartisan neo-imperialist policy of British governments and today he is paying the consequences with failure and resignation, while Burnham, a Russian-speaking and pro-Zionist like the entire British establishment, is preparing to succeed him. He promises the renationalization of transport and the strengthening of the welfare system, and has announced that his first trip as prime minister will be to Israel.
It's very strange that Starmer hasn't resigned entirely; he will remain in charge of current affairs for an as-yet-unclear period of time: nothing would prevent Burnham from immediately taking office at Downing Street. Perhaps the deep state needs time to educate the new prime minister and prevent him from deviating from the expected course of forced rearmament, and to allow him to prepare the British people for the introduction of an electronic identity card (read: social control under the guise of keeping minors away from social media). It will be interesting to see shortly whether the resigning Starmer will sign off on the defense spending increase: an excellent excuse to avoid passing the buck to his successor, or a decision made now to avoid future risks.
In any case, Britain appears to have no alternative, and the choices being made will not prevent the consequent rise of the most reactionary forces, starting with Farage's Reform party and perhaps including its most radical followers, such as the neo-Nazis of Restore Britain led by Rupert Lowe, who will bring with them the growth of racial conflict. But isn't this what Starmer was preparing for by supporting and fueling policies of deporting migrants who are permanently resident in the country, along with the rejection of new migrants and illegal immigrants?
Our hope and desire is that the new prime minister will accelerate the process that will transform the country into a disunited kingdom.
https://www.ucadi.org/2026/06/27/cosa-ce-di-nuovo-regno-disunito-il-trionfo-dellinstabilita/
_________________________________________
Source - A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten