World,The End Malnutrition Daily is out! Edition of 29 October 2014‏

	The End Malnutrition Daily Published by Fred Tissandier 29 October 2014 Science Business Leisure World Environment Art & Entertainment #hunger #ebola
	Today's headline Vitamin E and the latest science II: Air Pollution Registration vts­.inxpo.com - The impact of air pollution on human health is a global issue, with 80% of the population living in regions that exceed WHO air quality guidelines. Exposure has been associated with increased cardi...
	166 contributors - featured today:
	Read paper →
Email powered by

Belgium, demonstration,Brussels ,solidarity with the assassinated demonstrator Rémi,Testet,France

(Men zegge het voort!)

BIJEENKOMST
ZATERDAG 1 november - 18u
stalingradlaan (zuid-station) in brussel

In de loop van de nacht van zaterdag 25 oktober werd een betoger, Rémi, gedood door de politie tijdens rellen in Testet, waar een betoging bezig was tegen de bouw van een dam in Sivens (zuiden van Frankrijk).

“Laten we krachtig reageren zodat er een vóór en een ná deze dode is. Laten we krachtiger dan ooit onze solidariteit tonen met allen die in Testet en elders strijden tegen hun projecten gericht op controle en winst, maar ook met allen die meer
in stilte vallen onder de slagen van de repressie overal elders.”

DE MACHT MOORDT


http://bxl.indymedia.org/spip.php?article5599

World,Europa,Belgium, Verjaardag van .. Anniversaire .. Anniversary .. Yıldönümü .. Jahrestag ..29 oktober

World,Europa,Belgium, Verjaardag van .. Anniversaire .. Anniversary .. 

Yıldönümü ..  Jahrestag .. etc ...29 oktober



Vandaag word ik weer een jaartje jonger ..en ben daar zeer blij om  :-)

Aujourd'hui, je suis à nouveau un an plus jeune ..et suis là très heureux:-)

Today I am again a year younger ..and am very happy for that:-)

Heute bin ich wieder ein Jahr jünger ..und bin sehr glücklich dafür:-)

Bugün tekrar bir yıl daha genç olduğumu ..ve bunun için çok mutluyum:-)

Etc ....


World Wide Blogger

Human Rights and Gay activist

lucschrijvers@hotmail.com

twitter : @luc-schrijvers

skype : luc-schrijvers

facebook : l.m.j_schrijversluc@hotmail.com

Luc Schrijvers

Britain does'nt support any rescue in the Mediterranean‏

"the Guardian" (UK), 28 octobre 2014

UK axes support for Mediterranean migrant rescue operation

Refugees and human rights organisations react with anger as minister says saving people encourages others to risk voyage

by Alan Travis


Britain will not support any future search and rescue operations to prevent migrants and refugees drowning in the Mediterranean, claiming they simply encourage more people to attempt the dangerous sea crossing, Foreign Office ministers have quietly announced.

Refugee and human rights organisations reacted with anger to the official British refusal to support a sustained European search and rescue operation to prevent further mass migrant drownings, saying it would contribute to more people dying needlessly on Europe’s doorstep.

The British refusal comes as the official Italian sea and rescue operation, Mare Nostrum, is due to end this week after contributing over the past 12 months to the rescue of an estimated 150,000 people since the Lampedusa tragedies in which 500 migrants died in October 2013.

The Italian operation will now end without a similar European search and rescue operation to replace it. The Italian authorities have said their operation, which involves a significant part of the Italian navy, is unsustainable. Despite its best efforts, more than 2,500 people are known to have drowned or gone missing in the Mediterranean since the start of the year.

Instead of the Italian operation, a limited joint EU “border protection” operation, codenamed Triton and managed by Frontex, the European border agency, is to be launched on 1 November. Crucially, it will not include search and rescue operations across the Mediterranean, just patrols within 30 miles of the Italian coast.

Human rights organisations have raised fears that more migrants and refugees will die in their attempt to reach Europe from the north African coast. The hard-pressed Italian navy will be left to mount what search and rescue operations it can. The new European operation will have only a third of the resources of the Italian operation that is being phased out.

British policy was quietly spelled out in a recent House of Lords written answer by the new Foreign Office minister, Lady Anelay: “We do not support planned search and rescue operations in the Mediterranean,” she said, adding that the government believed there was “an unintended ‘pull factor’, encouraging more migrants to attempt the dangerous sea crossing and thereby leading to more tragic and unnecessary deaths”.

Anelay said: “The government believes the most effective way to prevent refugees and migrants attempting this dangerous crossing is to focus our attention on countries of origin and transit, as well as taking steps to fight the people smugglers who wilfully put lives at risk by packing migrants into unseaworthy boats.”

The Home Office told the Guardian the government was not taking part in Operation Triton at present beyond providing one “debriefer” – a single immigration officer – to gather intelligence about the migrants who continue to make the dangerous journey to Italy.

Other EU countries have responded to the call for help with two fixed-wing aircraft and three patrol vessels.

It is understood that Britain does not rule out providing further support later for an operation it says will be limited to “border management”. As it does not involve search and rescue missions it will not be covered by British government policy which regards the rescue of desperate migrants as only encouraging others to make the hazardous journey.

The home secretary, Theresa May, was among justice and home affairs ministers who agreed earlier this month to the ending of the Italian search and rescue operation and to deploying Operation Triton without delay in order to “reinforce border surveillance in the waters close to the Italian shores”.

European interior ministers acknowledged that the situation in the Mediterranean was of the greatest concern “as there are indications that the current trend will continue and the situation even risks deteriorating further”.

As well as deploying “Task Force Mediterranean”, which includes two fixed-wing surveillance aircraft and three patrol vessels in Operation Triton, ministers agreed a series of North African measures including finding ways of curtailing the supply of vessels from Tunisia and Egypt used by people smugglers.

May told the Commons the meeting had agreed “the prompt withdrawal of the Mare Nostrum operation … and for all member states to comply fully with their obligations under EU migration and asylum [policies].”

Admiral Filippo Maria Foffi, the commander in charge of the Italian naval squadron involved in Mare Nostrum, is expected to spell out on Tuesday the impact of its cancellation.

The British Refugee Council chief executive, Maurice Wren, responding to the Foreign Office refusal to take part in future search and rescue operations in the Mediterranean said: “The British government seems oblivious to the fact that the world is in the grip of the greatest refugee crisis since the second world war.

“People fleeing atrocities will not stop coming if we stop throwing them life-rings; boarding a rickety boat in Libya will remain a seemingly rational decision if you’re running for your life and your country is in flames. The only outcome of withdrawing help will be to witness more people needlessly and shamefully dying on Europe’s doorstep.

“The answer isn’t to build the walls of fortress Europe higher, it’s to provide more safe and legal channels for people to access protection.”

Tony Bunyan, director of Statewatch, which documents European justice and home affairs policies, added: “The government’s justification for not participating in Triton is cynical and an abdication of responsibility by saying that not helping to rescue people fleeing from war, persecution and poverty who are likely to perish is an acceptable way to discourage immigration.”

Amnesty International wrote to the home secretary last month criticising the woeful response from European countries to the unacceptable scale of the loss of life from the influx of refugees and migrants on boats across the Mediterranean.


http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/oct/27/uk-mediterranean-migrant-rescue-plan

(en) Turkey, DAF, 22nd issue of Meydan - An Interview with Revolutionary Anarchist Action on Koban?: ?We are Kawa against Dehaks? (tr)

For two years now the foundations of social revolution have been being developed in 
Rojava, the west of Kurdistan. Bearing this, it?s hard to ignore the fact that the basis 
of the attacks against Koban? is the interest politics of Turkish State and global 
capitalism. Abd?lmelik Yalcin and Merve Dilber from Revolutionary Anarchist Action were in 
the region of Suruc, on the border with Koban?, since the first day of the resistance 
against the attempts to obscure the people?s revolution, in solidarity with the people of 
the region. We interviewed them on the Koban? Resistance and Rojava Revolution. ---- Since 
the beginning of the Koban? Resistance, you have organized a lot of protests and made 
leaflets and posters. You also participated in ?the human chain border watch? that was 
organized in the villages at Suruc, near Koban? border. What was your purpose of going 
there? Could you tell us about what you lived there?

M. D.: Due to the Rojava Revolution the borders between the parts of Kurdistan that fell 
within Syrian and Turkish territory started to melt away. The Turkish State even tried to 
build a wall to destroy this effect of the revolution. In the midst of the war in interest 
of global capitalism and states in the region, the Kurdish people in Syria took a step 
along the path that leads to social revolution. Thanks to this step a real front emerged 
that leads to the freedom of the people, and in Koban?, a total attack against revolution 
was started by the hands of ISIS, the violent mob produced by global capitalism. As 
revolutionary anarchists, when we considered the situation in Koban? and all of Rojava, it 
was impossible for us not to become directly involved in it. Whereas the borders between 
states were abolished, it is vital to be in solidarity with peoples resisting in Koban?. 
We are at the 15th month of the Rojava Revolution. In these 15 months, we organized a lot 
of joint protests and made leafleting and wheatpasting actions. During the latest wave of 
attacks against the revolution in Koban?, we similarly made a lot of leafleting and 
wheatpasting and also organized a lot of street protests. However we had to go to Koban? 
border to salute the Kurdish people? struggle for freedom against the attacks of ISIS mob. 
In the night of 24 September we departed from Istanbul to the Koban? border. We met our 
comrades who arrived a little bit earlier and together started our human chain border 
guard in Boyd? village, in the west of Koban?. There were hundreds of volunteers like us 
who came from different parts of Anatolia and Mesopotamia to the border forming a human 
chain along 25km of the borderline in different villages like Boyd?, Beth?, Etmank? and 
Dew?an. One of the aims of the human chain was to stop man, arms and logistics support to 
ISIS from the Turkish State, whose support to ISIS is known by everyone. In the border 
villages the life itself has transformed into a communal life, despite the war conditions. 
Another aim of our border watch was to interfere in solidarity with the people of Koban?, 
who had to escape from the attacks against Koban?, who were delayed at the border for 
weeks and who were even attacked by Turkish military police forces (jandarma). In the 
first days of our border watch actions, we cut the wires and crossed to Koban? together 
with people coming from Istanbul.

Could you please tell us what happened after you crossed the border to Koban??

A.Y.: The moment we passed the border, we were greeted with huge enthusiasm. In the border 
villages of Koban?, everyone, young and old, were on the streets. YPG and YPJ guerrillas 
saluted our elimination of borders by firing into air. We rallied in the streets of 
Koban?. Later, we had conversations with people of Koban? and the YPG/YPJ guerrillas who 
defend the revolution. It is very important that the borders between peoples that the 
states erected were smashed like this. This action which occurred in the conditions of war 
shows once more that uprisings and revolutions cannot be stopped by the borders of states.

There were a lot of news about people who participated in ?the human chain border watch? 
and the rural population around the border being attacked by military police and regular 
cops. What does the Turkish State try to achieve with its bullying at the border? What do 
you think about it?

A.Y.: Yes, it is true that the policy of the Turkish State is to attack everyone who is 
involved in the border watch and who lives in the border villages, and everyone from 
Koban? who tries to cross the border. Sometimes these attacks happen frequently and 
sometimes they last for days. It is obvious that each attack has its own excuse as well as 
its own purpose. We observed that during nearly every military (gendarme) attack, trucks 
transport some stuff to the other side of the border. We are not sure about the exact 
contents of these shipments to ISIS. However, we could understand by the power of the 
attacks that sometimes it was to let people cross the border to join ISIS, sometimes to 
send arms and in other times it was to provide ISIS with its daily needs. These shipments 
were sometimes carried by vehicles with official plate numbers and sometimes by gangs who 
make state sponsored ?smuggling?. Moreover these state sponsored gangs usurped the 
properties of the people of Koban? who wait at the border. Military police on the other 
hand let people cross the border with a commission fee of 30 percent. The policies of the 
state against the local population have been the same for years. Due to the conditions of 
war, this policy has become much more visible now. The attacks at the border are conducted 
with the purpose of intimidating the people in border watch actions and the people of the 
border villages.

Although the Turkish State denies this, it was more or less known that it supports ISIS. 
However you say that now, even people who cross the border to join ISIS can easily be 
seen. So in this region it is not hidden that the Turkish State supports ISIS. How does 
this support work at the border?

M. D.: The Turkish State insistently denied its support to ISIS. However, ironically, 
whenever it declared a denial, a new shipment was being organized at the border. A lot of 
these shipments were large enough to be easily observed. For example: different vehicles 
brought ?assistance packages? to border. We were witnesses to the fact that tens of 
?service vehicles? with black windows crossed the border. Nobody really wonders what is 
inside these vehicles. We all know that the needs of ISIS are satisfied through this channel.

Would you please care to explain the historical and contemporary importance for the 
revolutionary anarchists of embracing the Koban? Resistance and Rojava Revolution, 
especially at a time like this?

A.Y.: The Koban? Resistance and Rojava Revolution should not be considered as separate 
from the long history of Kurdish people?s struggle for freedom. In the land we live in, 
the struggle of Kurdish people for freedom was called the ?Kurdish problem?. For years, it 
was misrepresented as a problem sourced by the people and not of the state. We say it 
again: this is the struggle of Kurdish people for freedom. The only problem here then is 
the state. Kurdish people have been fighting a struggle of existence against the 
destruction and denial politics of Republic of Turkey for years, and against other 
political powers in these lands for hundreds of years. This fight is given against the 
state and capitalism with the organized power of people. In the slogan ?PKK is people, 
people are here?, it?s clear who this political agent is, which became distinct in each 
and every individual and who this organized power is. Ever since we solidified our 
perception into struggle, in different contexts, our relationship with Kurdish individuals 
and society and the organization of Kurdish people, have been mutual solidarity. We base 
this relationship on the perspective of peoples? struggle for freedom. In people?s 
struggle for freedom, anarchist movements have always been catalyzers. In an age where 
Socialism couldn?t get out of Europe, when there were no theories called ?Right of Nations 
Choosing Their Own Destiny?, anarchist movement took different forms in different regions 
of world as people?s fight for freedom. To understand this, it?s enough see the influence 
of anarchism on people?s struggles in a wide range from Indonesia to Mexico. Also, neither 
the revolution in Rojava, nor the struggle of Zapatistas in Chiapas fit into description 
of classical national freedom struggles. Nation as a political term obviously has the 
state by definition. Therefore while considering the peoples? struggle for stateless 
self-organizations, we need to keep a distance to the concept ?nation?. On the other hand 
our approach does not involve likening or similarizing the Koban? Resistance to any other 
historical instances. Nowadays different groups mention different historical periods and 
liken the Koban? Resistance to these instances. However, it must be known that the Koban? 
Resistance is the Koban? Resistance itself; and the Rojava Revolution is the Rojava 
Revolution itself. If one wants to associate the Rojova Revolution, which created the 
basis for social revolution, one can investigate the social revolution that realized in 
the Iberian Peninsula.

Although the resistance in Koban? is happening outside of the borders of the Turkish 
State, solidarity demonstrations were held in every corner of the world. What is your 
evaluation of the effects of the Koban? Resistance ? well the Rojava Revolution, actually 
? on particularly Anatolia but also on the Middle East and also on a global level? What 
are your predictions related to these effects?

M. D.: The calls for serhildan (Kurdish word for uprising) were answered in Anatolia, 
especially in cities in Kurdistan. Starting from the first night (of the demonstrations) 
everyone in the streets saluted the Koban? Resistance and the Rojava Revolution against 
the ISIS gangs and their supporter the Turkish State. Especially in the cities of 
Kurdistan, the state attacked the people?s serhildan with its law enforcement and 
paramilitary associates. The state with its Hizbulkontra (A word play connecting the words 
Hezbollah and Contra-T.N) associates terrorized Kurdistan and killed 43 of our brothers. 
These massacres are indicating how much the Turkish State fears the Rojava revolution and 
the possibility that such a revolution could also generalize in its territory. Attacking 
with the desperation out of fear, the Turkish State and global capitalism have another 
fear is of course related to Middle East region. In the Middle East, despite all the 
plans, depredation and manufactured violence; social revolution still managed to emerge. 
This messed up all the plans of global capitalism and regional states. This is such an 
upheaval that despite all the depravations, social revolution could emerge in Rojava. This 
revolution is the answer to all the doubt of whether revolution can happen in this region 
and on global level. It strengthened the confidence in revolution specifically for the 
people of this region but also on the global scale. The purpose of all social revolutions 
in history was to achieve a globally socialized revolution. In this perspective we called 
international anarchist groups to act in solidarity with the Koban? Resistance and the 
Rojava Revolution. With our call for solidarity, anarchists from different parts of the 
world from Germany, to Athens, to Brussels, to Amsterdam, to Paris and to New York held 
demonstrations. We salute once more every anarchist organization that received our call, 
organized demonstrations related to our call, and those who stayed here with us in the 
human chain border watch.

Starting from the first days of ISIS?s attack, the Turkish State-sponsored media made a 
lot of news that claimed Koban? is about to fall. However, what they understand after more 
than one month now, is this: Koban? won?t fall! Yes, Koban? did not and will not fall. We, 
as Meydan Newspaper, salute your solidarity with Koban?. Is there anything else you want 
to add?

M. D.: We, as revolutionary anarchists, witnessed, lived and are still living the 
invincibleness of the confidence in revolution, even in the circumstances of war in our 
region. What is happening in Rojava is a social revolution! This social revolution, where 
the borders are abolished, states are being rendered powerless, plans of global capitalism 
are disturbed, will also generalize in our region. We invite every oppressed individual to 
look from the point of view of the oppressed. With this awareness we also invite them to 
support the organized struggle for social revolution. This is the only way to fertilize 
the seeds which were planted in Rojava and live the social revolution in wider regions. 
Long Live the Koban? Resistance! Long Live the Rojava Revolution!

This article was published in the 22nd issue of Meydan Newspaper

Source: 
http://meydangazetesi.org/gundem/2014/10/devrimci-anarsist-faaliyet-ile-kobane-uzerine-roportaj-dehaklara-karsi-kawayiz/

(en) AF leaflet on the TUC demo in London ? 18th October 2014: We need a lot more than a pay rise

?Hardworking workers who work hard at work.? That?s all we hear about from politicians ? 
Labour, Tory or LibDem (remember them?). But the attack on our living standards goes way 
beyond the workplace. There?s the bedroom tax and benefit cuts for a start. We need a lot 
more than a pay rise. And focusing on wages ignores the attacks on those who can?t work, 
or whose work is unpaid. ---- The social wage ? benefits, pensions, the NHS ? is under 
attack like never before. Last year, food banks provided 20 million meals ? 54% up on 
2012. The situation is obviously desperate. According to the Institute for Fiscal Studies, 
sixty per cent of planned cuts have yet to be implemented and the situation will get a lot 
worse over the next few years. ---- A to B to where? ---- So here we are again, on another 
A to B march. It?s always good to remind yourself that you?re not alone in opposing cuts 
and attacks on living standards. But ask yourself, did any of the previous A to B marches 
change anything? The million strong demo in 2003, did it stop the illegal war on Iraq? Did 
the huge demonstrations in March 2011 and October 2012 stop the cuts? Did they hell! No, 
in all instances, government carried on as before.

What is needed is imaginative action at local and national level. Action like the mums 
from Focus E15, who have fought displacement and eviction, stood up to their Labour 
council, and shown what can be done by ordinary people if we stick together and fight to win.

This will mean blockades, occupations and other forms of direct action. It will mean 
building campaigns and movements where decisions are not made by leaders or celebrities 
but by the people affected. It means making links with other people fighting cuts in their 
areas. But more than anything else, it means getting stuck in and not relying on 
politicians and leaders to do it for us.

Printed and published by Anarchist Federation (London) BM ANARFED LONDON WC1N 3XX

http://www.afed.org.uk london [at] afed.org.uk
* for more about the E15 Mothers, see: 
http://www.afed.org.uk/publications/resistance-bulletin/431-resistance-bulletin-issue-157-angry-women-win-special-issue-autumn-2014.html 
(last article)

France, Alternative Libertaire AL 1000 Cows: solidarity with farmers indicted by Guillaume (fr, pt)

[machine translation]

July 1, 2014, nine activists were summoned Peasant Confederation court of Amiens. Their 
crime? Have made a giant tag and have removed some construction equipment and milking 
parlor. But this is not the most serious. This leads them today before the Court, it is to 
be taken to the factory farm 1000 cows, refusing the industrialization of agriculture, 
choosing action rather than to resign himself to disappear. ---- The number of farmers is 
plummeting. Modernization, which first led to improved working conditions, led to the 
industrialization of agriculture that gradually destroys agriculture. There is no question 
of select seeds on the farm. Industrial law and we are imposing their GMOs. It is also 
impossible to manage a herd with the expertise of the breeder, electronic chipping of 
small ruminants is mandatory. As for processed products on the farm, the number of food 
standards has made clear the way for industrial products.

These are just the highlights of a pushed by agricultural policies movement traits. * CAP 
continues to support the expansion and exclude smaller. The agricultural future Act 
currently under discussion, does nothing to protect farmers. The end of milk quotas will 
encourage an explosion of production against which many do not take the shot. On all 
sides, called the farmers to increase volumes, to reduce costs. We pretend to forget what 
a crisis of overproduction.

The factory farm 1000 cows is the symbol of this madness. 9,000,000 liters of milk sold at 
250 euros a tonne while breeders barely break even with 350 euros. Milk has become a 
byproduct of manure that feeds into a giant digester. A project whose profitability is up 
to the production of subsidized energy.

Financial support for the Confederation Paysanne:
http://www.faireundon.enviedepaysans.fr/

Farmers have to watch their business disappear without doing anything? It was time to 
launch the alert, screaming urgency to respond if we continue to see the peasants in the 
countryside.

Peasant Confederation has taken up its responsibilities, three times on the site of the 
factory farm 1,000 cows. The risk was great, of course, end up before a judge. But what 
does it face the risk of their extinction?

Today, this legitimate action is criminalized. Peasant Confederation went against the will 
of our leaders who think stock prices and trade balance. Activists disturbing and union 
repression starts. In front, the sponsor of the 1000 cows, Michel Ramery continues to 
build its plant, with impunity, despite the glaring irregularities and intimidation 
methods worthy of gangster movies. The double standard is obvious.

The gravedigger peasants 369th fortune of France, so has much more support than have 
hundreds of thousands of peasants. And matter as farms disappear from the landscape, the 
rural depopulation continues, unemployment continues to rise, that we do not have a 
standardized diet, provided that finance continues to fatten.

In this system, there is no room for dispute. 250 militants lock time of a meeting of 
bosses, cast aspersions on the strikers, or send farmers to court, there is never no 
exaggeration when it comes to protecting certain interests.

The future of agriculture affects us all! We stand in solidarity activists of the Peasant 
Confederation. We call for their release!

Signatories: Didier Aub? (Solidarity), Clementine Autain (Ensemble), Genevi?ve Azam 
(attact), Julien Bayou (EELV), Gilles Bazin (agronomist), Olivier Besancenot (NPA), Simon 
Besnard (MRJC), Walter Bessan (resistant citizen) Eric Beynel (Solidarity), Martine 
Billard (Left Party), Nathalie Bonnet (South rail), Jos? Bov? (former trade unionist), 
Alain Cambi (Southern Rail), Jacques Caplat (Acting for the environment), Andr? Chassaigne 
(PCF ), Samuel Churin (Coordination intermittent and precarious), Karima Delli (EELV), 
Marc Dufumier (agronomist), Julien Durand (ACIPA / NDDL), Bruno Gaccio (New Deal), Jean 
Gadrey (economist), Nicolas Galepides (Sud PTT ), Susan George (ATTAC), Cecile Gondard 
Lalanne (Solidarity), Bernadette Groison (Fsu), Iban Gross (Bizi), Jean-Fran?ois Julliard 
(Greenpeace), Michel Kfoury (Novissen), Kris (BD writer), Martine Laplante ( Friends of 
the Earth), Pierre Larrouturou (New Deal), Pierre Laurent (PCF), Gilles Lemaire (Attac), 
Corinne Lepage (Cap 21), Fran?oise Martens (Union of Magistrates), Xavier Mathieu 
(Unionist Conti), Jean Luc M?lenchon (Left Party), Fabien Milin (South Customs), Jean 
Mouzat (Modef *), Serge Muller (Friends of the Conf), Marie-Monique Robin (journalist), 
Christian Rouaud (Director), Denis Sieffert (reporter ), Edith Soboul (Alternative 
libertarian), Jacques Testart (scientific), Aur?lie Found (Attac), Hanny van Geel 
(European Coordination Via Campesina)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGhJwN5mEok