50 years after the military coup which ended the government of SalvadorAllende, commemorations took place. Most focused on the repressionsuffered by the population, highlighting human rights and obscuringanother aspect of this coup: the establishment of a new form ofcapitalist exploitation: neoliberalism. ---- The leading figure of thiseconomic movement is Milton Friedman. This theorist campaigns forfreedom of prices and wages. Thus, the functions of the State must belimited to its sovereign functions. This translates into total freedomfor capitalists, exploitation and repression for workers, destruction ofpublic services, etc.Friedman held a teaching position at the University of Chicago forseveral decades. He was awarded the Nobel Prize for economics in 1976.He trained a number of students, notably Chileans, at the Chicago School- hence their nickname "Chicago Boys" - then at the Pontifical CatholicUniversity. of Santiago. They are essentially the ones who will writethe neoliberal program implemented by Pinochet's government. Theprinciple is to consider that the economy is no longer a matter of humanand political choices, but is naturalized and must be treated like anynatural science. Consequently, we must let economic mechanisms actwithout any intervention, particularly from the State: free functioningof markets, freedom of prices and wages... The strongest win every time;the others manage in a totally unbalanced balance of power for thebenefit of the capitalists.This program was implemented very quickly in Chile: privatization ofstate companies, authorization of new forms of speculative finance,opening of borders to goods, 10% reduction in state spending (except forthe army), end of price control (even for basic foodstuffs).In 1974, inflation rose to 375% (twice as much as under Allende); andunemployment is also on the rise (by 20% after a year of Pinochetgovernment), due to competition from imported products over those fromChile. The main beneficiaries of these political choices are foreigncompanies, which are not subject to any constraints, and speculators,nicknamed "piranhas".But the Chicago Boys are campaigning to continue and amplify thisneoliberal policy in order to curb the "50 years of state intervention":public spending will be reduced by 27% in 1975, and by half compared tothose under Allende in 1980. .The consequences for the Chilean population are dramatic. From 1973 to1983, the industrial sector lost 177,000 jobs. The country is plungedinto a great recession which is sharply increasing poverty.Several public services are in turmoil. The school system is reformed:public schools are replaced by charter schools giving access to "studyvouchers". In health, we impose the idea of the user paying.Kindergartens and cemeteries are privatized...In 1982, the Chilean economy was on the ground, the public debt wasexploding, inflation continued to rise, 30% of the working populationwas unemployed - and the "piranhas" had accumulated a debt of 14 billiondollars vis-à-vis towards Chile.In 1988, 45% of Chileans lived below the poverty line, while the richest10% saw their income increase by 83%. In 2007, Chile is one of the mostunequal countries in the world.This neoliberal policy does not remain confined to Chile. In the 1980s,the bourgeoisie adopted it elsewhere.Thus, Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher worked to implement it in GreatBritain. In 1984, a miners' strike broke out who fought, among otherthings, against the closure of the pits. It lasts one year. The minersget nothing. One of the issues concerned the evolution of capitalism.With this defeat, Thatcher has free rein to implement the policyadvocated by her friend Friedman. Great Britain is experiencing itsshare of privatizations, but also of state disengagement, theliberalization of the circulation of capital by the end of exchangecontrols, the limitation of the right to strike, the repression ofworkers, etc. Living and working conditions are deteriorating sharply. Asignificant part of the population is impoverished. "There is noalternative" became one of the most famous slogans of the "Iron Lady".It enjoys worldwide success with rulers and the bourgeoisie.The same is true in the United States. Shortly after arriving at theWhite House in 1980, Ronald Reagan faced a strike by air trafficcontrollers - he managed to break it. Thus, Friedman's ideas are onceagain implemented. It is always the workers who suffer the consequences,with the tightening of conditions of exploitation, both in terms of workand life in general. We are witnessing a growing impoverishment of partof the American population, and the income gap between the rich and theworkers continues to grow.The neoliberal wave is sweeping the planet. In France, the governmentsof the left, alternating with those of the right, fit into this moldwithout the slightest resistance: it will be who can privatize the best,break public services, reduce workers' rights always in order to toughenthe conditions of employment. exploitation for the benefit ofcapitalists. Precariousness and flexibility are widely developed; theretirement age is increasing; Social Security is increasinglystate-controlled, with the corollary of its weakening in favor ofprivate insurers. Public services are sold piecemeal - health, PTT, thenFrance Telecom. The unemployment rate is increasing at the same time asbenefits are falling and the conditions for qualifying for them aretightening. The creation of the RMI, then the RSA, will establish theidea that we can no longer really stem unemployment. We give a fewcrumbs to maintain almost unbearable living conditions.The icing on the cake is that some will now have to work for free toreceive RSA benefits. The living conditions of undocumented immigrantsare increasingly harsh in order to force them to accept totally degradedjobs (being in an illegal situation, it is very difficult for them toassert rights recognized by the Labor Code; let's not talk about wages,working hours, etc.). These jobs are essential in agriculture,construction or catering, so that they are profitable: these are thefamous "sectors in tension" (new formula to designate a situation thathas existed for decades).All this has a logic. By raising the retirement age, we force people wholose their job to accept another one in poor conditions to finish theircareer. By reducing unemployment benefits and tightening the conditionsfor qualifying for them, we are forcing people to accept any job. Andthe same for undocumented immigrants. Thus we exploit different segmentsof the population (to use technocratic vocabulary) so that they putpressure, in spite of themselves, on the labor market to intensifyexploitation by lowering wages and degrading working conditions.The bourgeoisie is lucid: it wants to limit the risks regarding themaintenance of its hegemony and profit rates. It must protect itselfagainst mobilizations against poverty, the deterioration of livingconditions and the environmental crisis. This is why a repressive andpopulation control apparatus is developed by gradually hardening,whatever the color of successive governments.African countries are also suffering the consequences. The socialsituation of each of them is catastrophic. Imperialist relations areincreasingly exacerbated, leading millions of people to poverty, evendeath through famine, war, disease... The imposition of neoliberalpolicies has greatly worsened the situation in many countries, Africa inparticular: the harassment orchestrated by Western states, the IMF andthe World Bank against them to repay their debts has largely contributedto the destruction of their public services as well as theimpoverishment of entire sections of their populations .It's a real wave that has been breaking for half a century. It is clearthat, for the moment, we have not found the tools to oppose it. Thedefeat of the movement against the increase in the retirement age in2023 is yet another demonstration of this.Fortunately, movements continue to emerge around the world, althoughCovid has put a temporary halt to them. It is by developing convergencesof class interests that new power relationships can be built. They willbe able to ask the question of breaking with capitalism, putting an endto productivism, building societies which will be ecologically viable,based on social equality, solidarity, the return to human - local -dimensions in order to extract from these large groups which can only bemanaged by States and require infrastructures that destroy the planet.J. Christophehttp://oclibertaire.lautre.net/spip.php?article3985_________________________________________A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C EBy, For, and About AnarchistsSend news reports to A-infos-en mailing listA-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten