(en) France, Coordination of Anarchist Groups IAL #99 - It would take a very little law Fioraso! (fr, pt)

After the entry well sickening "law Fioraso and continuity of social destruction in 
college" in the previous issue of IAL, go to the next dish "law and Fioraso threat in 
social work." Because this law also has effects on the formation of workers social ale. 
---- learning trades social (including monitor ? ? trice trice educator, educator 
specializing trice, assistant social service) occurs alternately (course + internship) for 
a period of two or three years. Internships are longer or shorter according to the sector 
and stage of training. To feed these hungry Students, some internships are unpaid. But 
then, everyone is not housed in the same boat or served at the same table. In fact, only 
employer in the private sector (companies, associations) and public agencies of the State 
are being held legally reward courses for more than two months 1 .

About the public sector, the famous law Fioraso2 submit all the golf course to the 
requirement of gratification. But the minister put water in his wine face mobilization 
among other students. She announced last October a consultation to take into account the 
budgetary situation of the public. And local authorities and public institutions are free 
for this year 2013-2014, to regale the students or leave dieters.

What do we complain?

Gratification is good because it gives a better flavor to training followed by students 
not less precarious. The problem is that it costs money - always money ... But in these 
times of budget shortages (the crisis is a reality but also a good excuse) facilities and 
services there think twice before welcome ? a trainee. Some even prefer the students 
compensated by employment center because in this case no need for gratification. This 
raises the question of equality before the internship.

Studentss have fangs

To return to public bodies, we saw that the gratuity is not mandatory this year. But what 
will it next year? If it becomes mandatory, the students be happy because they s and they 
can fill in a little more their bowl. But if public bodies are not given the means to 
enable them to implement this gratification, there is a safe bet that some will refuse 
foodies and they, too, receive trainees. Therefore golf course will be even fewer, which 
will inevitably impact the training of students: search for golf course located farther 
away from the training institution, lengthening training if course not delivered on time ...

Gratuity gratuity or not?

Since the bonus problem, why not simply delete? Because you always the students can not 
afford and do their training while managing the rest (food, housing ...); So any help is 
welcome. Especially in this case the bonus is not a salary or a sum in addition to regular 
pay. Indeed, as there is no compensation, gratuity is a simple and meager amount of money.

Because students work, which opens right to financial compensation. That the wage is 
already operating a fight and that wages are starving, if in addition the work done is not 
paid capitalist exploitation then reached an extreme stage.

Staying firm on claims and skeptical of ads

late February, State asserts that a "transition fund" will be created to "help newly 
subject to gratification organizations." More golf course will be offered additional 
services in the state. But let's see what it will give. This fund will be there permanent? 
The golf course will they really increase like that? By cons, as anarchists, support the 
students in their demands, including financial!

Group Haute-Savoie

1. For background, see Act of 31/03/06, a decree of 31/01/08, another of 21/07/09, an Act 
of 24/11/09, another 28/07 / 11.
2. Act "Fioraso" of 22.07.2013 relating to higher education and research.